WWB Trainer

Article Mode

Topic:
TST Four Mind Traps
Timeless ideas at the intersections of science, philosophy, critical thinking, and history.
One full article!
(This mode works on most browsers.)

A deep-dive article by Michael Alan Prestwood.

First, the key idea of the article: 

Logical Fallacies < TST Framework < Critical Thinking

The core takeaway concept is this: 

Cherry-picking is when someone focuses only on select pieces of information to distract and support a specific argument or decision.

Now, the article.

Cherry-picking is when someone focuses only on select pieces of information to support a specific argument or decision, ignoring other relevant or even contradicting data. We all do this sometimes—like choosing to buy something based on a single appealing feature. But there’s a problem: when we ignore the bigger picture, we’re more vulnerable to making biased choices, missing out on essential information.

This fallacy can be especially misleading when it’s done intentionally. Imagine a politician highlighting only the data that fits their agenda, while ignoring facts that might challenge their claims. They’re hoping you’ll focus on that one issue, emotion, or piece of data to sway your opinion. For instance, it’s easy to be drawn to a politician’s stance on a particular issue, like immigration or the economy, without realizing they might be distorting facts through selective data.

Cherry-picking isn’t always negative; sometimes it helps us decide quickly. But it’s still a fallacy. I’m Michael Alan Prestwood, reminding you that the best defense is to verify facts and always keep an eye on the bigger picture.


That TST Four Mind Traps FAQ, 

was first published on TST 1 year ago.
WWB Trainer
(c) 2025-2026 TouchstoneTruth.
Writing and coding by Michael Alan Prestwood.
Scroll to Top