In religion and philosophy, the existence and essence debate centers around whether you exist before and/or after your time on Earth. The scientific and Spinozan view is one substance, nature. Contrast this with two substances, our realm, and an afterlife realm.
Carl Sagan reminds us that we are intimately connected to the universe. The particles that form our bodies are borrowed from a cosmic pool of just 17 particles and four forces. Even more humbling, the molecules within us were forged in the hearts of stars, linking us directly to the vast cosmos that surrounds us.
Spiritual ideas have an agnostic, non-theistic, or theistic posture. They can also be calibrated to reality as empirically true, rationally true, speculative, or disproven. Speculative ideas remain open but unsupported; disproven ideas have failed against reality and should be released as truth.
The idea of existence before essence is most closely associated with modern existentialism, especially Jean-Paul Sartre. It rejects the notion of a soul or destiny and instead places responsibility on the individual to shape who they become. In contrast, essence before existence claims identity or purpose precedes birth. At its core, this debate lives in metaphysics, asking whether identity is discovered or created, and whether meaning is inherited or earned.
Identity feels solid, but it shifts with every stage of life. You are not fixed; you’re evolving. This line reminds us that “me” isn’t a static definition but an ongoing story. Knowing that frees you to grow, question, and become something better than yesterday’s version.
From History: You exist, then you mold your essence.
The essence–existence debate asks whether identity is predetermined or developed. Plato located essence beyond the material world; Aristotle and later Sartre rejected that move. TST aligns with a structured realism: biological constraints exist, but personal identity emerges over time through interaction and choice within mind-independent reality.
Ontology explores the nature of existence, asking whether life is purely material or something deeper. It helps us define our place and purpose. Ask yourself, who are you becoming? To live well, reflect on the kind of person you want to be, then grow into that way of being with intent. Your beliefs shape your path, but your choices shape the self that walks it.
Be open to new ideas, but anchor yourself in reality. Examine your framework. Refine it. Test it. The goal is not to defend your lens, but to align it more closely with what is. Intellectual humility begins with recognizing the split between interpretation and the world itself.
Whether you believe this life is all we have or part of something larger, ontology can make life feel more precious. It reminds us that existence is not casual. To live well, take control. You are here now, aware, temporary, and responsible. Live as if this moment matters—because under every worldview, it does.
What we casually call “empty space” is anything but empty. Even the quietest regions of the universe are shaped by particles passing through, forces acting at a distance, and fields extending everywhere. Our idea of emptiness reflects the limits of perception, not the absence of reality.
The End. Refresh for another set.
TST Trainer (c) 2025-2026 TouchstoneTruth. Writing and coding by Michael Alan Prestwood.