TST Trainer

3 Random Tidbits

Topic:
Philosophy of History
Timeless ideas at the intersections of science, philosophy, critical thinking, and history.

Philosophy of History.

3 random tidbits in about 5 minutes.

1.

A Philosophy of History FAQ.

Subject: Logical Fallacies.

The short answer is yes, but it is a logical fallacy—specifically, the cherry-picking fallacy. Yet, it’s often how we make decisions. It’s understandable why many choose to vote based on a single issue—like candidate character, the economy, or climate change. I even do this. I tend to put believe in science as my single issue. That tends to include voting for truth, character, and those that can see evidence clearly. It’s a straightforward, pragmatic approach: you identify what’s most important to you and select the candidate who best aligns with that priority. But, is it good thinking? While it might feel logical, it’s important to understand that this approach can be flawed.

Cherry-picking is a common tendency in decision-making. It’s why a salesperson usually focuses on a specific feature and why they try to figure out what you’re looking for. The problem? If you’re unaware, cherry-picking might cause you to overlook other, or even contradictory, information.

On the plus side, cherry-picking simplifies a complex process and helps you focus on what matters most to you. However, the downside is that it can lead to a narrow perspective, making you vulnerable to manipulation or missing important context. By ignoring broader aspects, you may unknowingly embrace something that contradicts your overall values or interests. Recognizing this limitation enables a more balanced and informed approach. For example, you might vote for a candidate because they support strong immigration policies, but this might lead you to ignore other aspects of their platform, like their economic policies that favor billionaires or their lack of integrity. Being aware doesn’t mean you abandon your focus, but it does open up the opportunity to expand your view.

Beyond politics, the cherry-picking fallacy shows up everywhere! It’s a common practical shortcut. Just be aware of it and recognize when it’s useful and when it’s limiting. If your chosen point is truly the most important, go for it. However, understanding this can expand your critical thinking abilities, enriching your perspective—especially over time.

 


That Philosophy of History FAQ, 

was first published on TST 2 years ago.
2.

A Philosophy of History FAQ.

Subject: Plant Evolution.

No, they both evolved from a common ancestor 1.5 billion years ago. Their common ancester likely lacked chlorophyll b and had a different light-harvesting system. Red algae got their distinctive color from phycoerythrin, which helps them absorb blue light in deeper waters. Green algae and land plants share chlorophyll, a key to their photosynthetic abilities.

Red algae thrive in deeper waters where blue light penetrates, while green algae dominate shallow waters because chlorophyll is much, much more efficient at absorbing red and blue light.

There are two other types too: brown and blue-green algae. Brown algae includes what some people call yellow algae, and large kelps that wash up on shore are brown algae. Blue-green algae isn’t actually algae! While we’ve agreed to call it that, it’s actually a photosynthetic bacteria.

The red-green algae split occurred about 200 million years after the broader separation of animals, plants, and fungi. Green algae later gave rise to land plants, with all land plants descending from green algae around 475 million years ago.

Both green algae and land plants share chlorophyll, a key to their photosynthetic abilities. Finally, green algae are generally considered the first true plants, while red algae remain classified as algae.

 


That Philosophy of History FAQ, 

was first published on TST 1 year ago.
3.

A Philosophy of History Story.

From History:
38,000 BCE
38,000 to 33,000 BCE

The Venus of Hohle Fels is a 2.4″ figurine made of wooly mammoth ivory that was unearthed in 2008 in Hohle Fels, a cave near Schelklingen, Germany. It was pieced together from six pieces found in a cluster, about 10 feet below ground, and about 60 feet from the cave entrance. The left arm and shoulder are still missing. In place of a head, a carved ring protrudes indicating the sculpture was likely worn as a pendant. Using radiocarbon dating, the figurine is dated to between 38,000 and 33,000 BCE.

 


That Philosophy of History Story, 

was first published on TST 5 years ago.

The end. Refresh for another set.

TST Trainer
(c) 2025-2026 TouchstoneTruth.
Writing and coding by Michael Alan Prestwood.
Scroll to Top