Phil • Cr. Think • Science • Hist •
TST PRACTICE

The Philosophy Website

STORY

Homo naledi: A Likely Hybrid

☐ Read
☑ Read
You’ve read this 0 times.
You’ve listened to this 0 times.

By Michael Alan Prestwood

Wed 24 Apr 2024
Published 2 years ago.
Updated 4 months ago.
Related Stories
Presentient Animals Emerge: The Ediacaran Prelude
Fire-Altered Stone Tools
Simple Sentience Settles: Haikouichthys
Great Apes: Medicine Emerges
Ukraine: Mezhyrich Community
Homo neanderthalensis: Verified True Symbolic Thought
Share :
Imagined image: Homo naledi. Left is circa 250,000 BCE. Right is circa 335,000 BCE. The later Homo naledi individual as appearing more human-like is somewhat speculative but can be supported by the evidence of their anatomical features and behaviors.

Homo naledi: A Likely Hybrid

335,000 BCE
Human, but probably not our human branch.

Speculative branch of humans. Maybe a long lost hybrid: In the evolving tapestry of human history, the emergence of Homo naledi represents a captivating mystery that challenges traditional narratives of linear progression. Positioned within the intricate web of human evolution, Homo naledi could exemplify a complex branch woven from ancient threads. Imagine a scenario where a group descended from late Australopithecus interbred with Homo erectus, resulting in a unique hybrid species. This hybrid lineage, embodying a blend of primitive and advanced traits, might have thrived alongside other hominins, contributing to a rich mosaic of human diversity. The existence of Homo naledi, with its distinct blend of characteristics, suggests that our evolutionary past may not be a simple tree with neatly diverging branches, but rather a dense network of interconnected lineages, intermingling and evolving in response to the dynamic landscapes of ancient Africa. Such a perspective invites us to reconsider the complexity of human ancestry, highlighting the possibility of multiple, overlapping narratives of evolution driven by hybridization and adaptation.

Imagined image: Homa naledi. Left is circa 250,000 BCE. Right is circa 335,000 BCE. The later Homo naledi individual as appearing more human-like is somewhat speculative but can be supported by the evidence of their anatomical features and behaviors.

Survival: From about 335,000 BCE to 236,000 BCE in Eastern and Southern Africa (in woodlands and grasslands)
Size: 3’4″ to 4’5″ (a bit taller than modern chimpanzees)
Brain Size: around 510 to 600 cm³
Brain to Body EQ: 3.3 to 3.8 (humans=7.4 to 7.8)

Primary Timeline…

— map / TST —

TST Tracker
✓ Reading recorded.
Michael Alan Prestwood
Author & Natural Philosopher
Prestwood writes on science-first philosophy, with particular attention to the convergence of disciplines. Drawing on his TST Framework, his work emphasizes rational inquiry grounded in empirical observation while engaging questions at the edges of established knowledge. With TouchstoneTruth positioned as a living touchstone, this work aims to contribute reliable, evolving analysis in an emerging AI era where the credibility of information is increasingly contested.
Email
Print
The Prestwood Column
Menu
August 2026
»COLUMN ARCHIVE
--COLUMN--
Column Research….
1. Timeline Story
Ethical Roadmap
2. Linked Quote
“The greatest weapon against stress is our ability to choose one thought over another.”
3. Science FAQ »
Did morality evolve?
4. Philosophy FAQ »
Is the Me Too movement consistent with TST Ethics?
5. Critical Thinking FAQ »
When should you stop following the crowd?
6. History FAQ!
What did the Nuremberg Trials clarify about moral agents?
Bonus Deep-Dive Article
TST Ethical Roadmap: A Process Model for Ethical Guidance and Moral Choice

Comments

Join the Conversation! Currently logged out.

Leave a Reply

NEW BOOK! NOW AVAILABLE!!

30 Philosophers: A New Look at Timeless Ideas

by Michael Alan Prestwood
The story of the history of our best ideas!
Scroll to Top