Phil • Cr. Think • Science • Hist •
TST PRACTICE

The Philosophy Website

STORY

Trump Manipulates Market, Crime=Securities Exchange Act of 1934

☐ Read
☑ Read
You’ve read this 0 times.
You’ve listened to this 0 times.

By PrestwoodIT

Sat 14 Sep 2019
Published 7 years ago.
Updated 5 months ago.
Related Stories
Russia establishes the Internet Research Agency
Crime: Trump, Cohen and Pecker Meet to Conspire
Crime: Trump Threatened Cohen’s Father
Bad Act/Possible Crime: Trump says, “Russia, if you’re listening”
Crime: Russia Starts Buying Social Media Ads
Crime: Papadopoulos Emails Trump Campaign about Russian Outreach
Share :
Financial success and green business
Businessman composing a successful financial chart with arrow going up, he is using green paper cuts, eco business and financial success concept

Trump Manipulates Market, Crime=Securities Exchange Act of 1934

On Monday, August 26, 2019, Trump announced at the G-7 summit in France that China in a recent phone call expressed desire for a deal. This news pushed the market higher gaining 250 points on the announcment. This was another LIE and crime! It is illegal under both securities and antitrust laws. The Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Section 9, specifically makes it unlawful to manipulate security prices.

Verified: Trump aids verified the phone call was fake and China insists it was unaware of the calls.

— map / TST —

TST Tracker
✓ Reading recorded.
Michael Alan Prestwood
Author & Natural Philosopher
Prestwood writes on science-first philosophy, with particular attention to the convergence of disciplines. Drawing on his TST Framework, his work emphasizes rational inquiry grounded in empirical observation while engaging questions at the edges of established knowledge. With TouchstoneTruth positioned as a living touchstone, this work aims to contribute reliable, evolving analysis in an emerging AI era where the credibility of information is increasingly contested.
Email
Print
The Prestwood Column
Menu
September 2026
Column Research….
1. Timeline Story
Hume’s Is–Ought Problem
2. Linked Quote
“I meet with no proposition that is not connected with an ought, or an ought not.”
3. Science FAQ »
Can science prove flourishing should be our goal?
4. Philosophy FAQ »
What is the difference between a normative aim and a normative directive?
5. Critical Thinking FAQ »
Is flourishing for all just utilitarianism?
6. History FAQ!
What is the history of the idea of flourishing in philosophy?
Bonus Deep-Dive Article
TST Normative Ethics: Flourishing as a Philosophical Goal

Comments

Join the Conversation! Currently logged out.

Leave a Reply

NEW BOOK! NOW AVAILABLE!!

30 Philosophers: A New Look at Timeless Ideas

by Michael Alan Prestwood
The story of the history of our best ideas!
Scroll to Top