Explore Science-first Philosophy

STORY

Biological Immortality

By PrestwoodIT

Mon 29 Apr 2024
Published 2 years ago.
Updated 2 weeks ago.
Related Stories
Brand New Constellations
Tipping Point Transition From Animal Meats
Full AI Doctor
The Rise of the Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCI)
Kardashev Type I: Planetary Civilization
Black Dwarf Sun
Share :

Biological Immortality

2200: 175 Years From Now (+/- 50 years)
7 Generations From Now (from 2020 CE)

Biological immortality, or negligible senescence, is not invincibility against accidents or violence, but rather the cessation of aging and the ability to prevent or cure all diseases, including genetic disorders. Essentially, it involves maintaining the body and its functions in a youthful state indefinitely. The key components of biological immortality include gene editing, disease cure and prevention, and aging process interruption.

I think we’ll attain biological immortality by about 2200 because rapid advancements in gene editing, disease treatment, cellular repair, and aging research, combined with the convergence of AI, biotech, and nanotech, will lead to a comprehensive understanding and control of human biology, enabling the cessation of aging and the prevention or cure of all diseases, including genetic disorders, thereby achieving negligible senescence and biological immortality.

— map / TST —

Michael Alan Prestwood
Author & Natural Philosopher
Prestwood writes on science-first philosophy, with particular attention to the convergence of disciplines. Drawing on his TST Framework, his work emphasizes rational inquiry grounded in empirical observation while engaging questions at the edges of established knowledge. With TouchstoneTruth positioned as a living touchstone, this work aims to contribute reliable, evolving analysis in an emerging AI era where the credibility of information is increasingly contested.
Email
Print
This month @ TST
Column Menu
May 2026
»COLUMN ARCHIVE
--COLUMN--
Column Research….
1. Timeline Story
Book: The Idea of History
2. Linked Quote
“The historian without his facts is rootless…the facts without their historian are…meaningless.”
3. Science FAQ »
Is science tainted by bias?
4. Philosophy FAQ »
Debating History: Should We Say “Dark Ages” or “Middle Ages?”
5. Critical Thinking FAQ »
What is the preservation bias?
6. History FAQ!
Did Einstein’s driver really give one of his early talks?
Bonus Deep-Dive Article
TST Philosophy of History

Comments

Join the Conversation! Currently logged out.

Leave a Reply

NEW BOOK! NOW AVAILABLE!!

30 Philosophers: A New Look at Timeless Ideas

by Michael Alan Prestwood
The story of the history of our best ideas!
Scroll to Top