Phil • Cr. Think • Science • Hist • …
TST PRACTICE

By Philosopher Michael Alan Prestwood

STORY

The Great Quaker Debates!

☐ Read
☑ Read
You’ve read this 0 times.
You’ve listened to this 0 times.

By Michael Alan Prestwood

Thu 7 Feb 2019
Published 8 years ago.
Updated 2 weeks ago.
Related Stories
Marcus Aurelius: An Explorative Agnostic
Major Religion: Hinduism
Social Constructs
Final Word
Eudaimonia
Guru Nanak
Share :

The Great Quaker Debates!

9 Aug 1672

The Great Quaker Debates took place on August 9, 10, 12, and 17, 1672. Although Roger Williams welcomed people with differing beliefs, he also relished the opportunity to present his own viewpoint. At about 69 or 70 years old, he rowed himself from Providence to Newport, more than 25 miles, arriving near midnight for the debate the next morning. His brother Robert, then a schoolmaster in Newport, helped during the proceedings. The first three days were held in Newport, with the final day held in Providence. Large audiences attended. Biblical Studies

Williams had originally challenged the famous Quaker George Fox, but Fox had already left Rhode Island. So Williams debated prominent Quakers William Edmundson, John Stubbs, and John Burnyeat instead. He organized his case into fourteen propositions, debating the first seven in Newport and the remaining seven in Providence on August 17. After four days of vigorous argument, nobody appears to have changed sides. That alone makes the episode a pretty good lesson in the limits of persuasion.

Four years later Williams published his account as George Fox Digg’d out of his Burrowes. The title itself was a double pun on George Fox and fellow Quaker Edward Burrough. Williams considered Quaker theology seriously wrong and sometimes wrote about it harshly, but he still defended the Quakers’ right to live and worship freely in Rhode Island. That is the important nuance. Tolerance did not mean agreement. Williams could argue forcefully against a belief while defending the civil liberty of the person holding it. The Great Quaker Debates remain an early example of fierce public disagreement living alongside liberty of conscience.

 

— map / TST —

TST Tracker
✓ Reading recorded.
Michael Alan Prestwood
Author & Natural Philosopher
Prestwood writes on science-first philosophy, with particular attention to the convergence of disciplines. Drawing on his TST Framework, his work emphasizes rational inquiry grounded in empirical observation while engaging questions at the edges of established knowledge. With TouchstoneTruth positioned as a living touchstone, this work aims to contribute reliable, evolving analysis in an emerging AI era where the credibility of information is increasingly contested.
Email
Print
The Prestwood Column
Menu
October 2026
Column Research….
1. Timeline Story
The Great Quaker Debates!
2. Linked Quote
“All men are prone to differ. It is no new thing in all former ages, in all parts. Each party is most right in his own eyes.”
3. Science FAQ »
Do facts actually change minds?
4. Philosophy FAQ »
When does persuasion become manipulation?
5. Critical Thinking FAQ »
How can you tell when a debate has stopped being productive?
6. History FAQ!
What is the history of debate?
Bonus Deep-Dive Article
Roger Williams Biography and Dedication to the Freedom of Conscience

Comments

Join the Conversation! Currently logged out.

Leave a Reply

NEW BOOK! NOW AVAILABLE!!

30 Philosophers: A New Look at Timeless Ideas

by Michael Alan Prestwood
The story of the history of our best ideas!
Scroll to Top