Explore Science-first Philosophy

FAQ

Debating History: Should We Say “Dark Ages” or “Middle Ages?”

Sun 28 Apr 2024
Published 2 years ago.
Updated 2 weeks ago.
Related FAQs
Were Plato and Aristotle friends?
What are holism and reductionism?
How are original Daoism, Mohism, Confucianism, and Legalism related?
How does consciousness differ from intelligence?
Was Roger Williams a Separatist?
Can AI evolve to destroy humanity?
Share :
Email
Print

Debating History: Should We Say “Dark Ages” or “Middle Ages?”

The correct term to use for the worldwide period is “Middle Ages,” or the adjective medieval. The term “Dark Ages” has largely been retired in scholarly circles or narrowed to focus on the religious oppression in Europe. Now, I’m actually in the minority on this issue. I think the adjective “dark” was well deserved worldwide, Not just in Europe. 

Historically, the term Dark Ages was used to describe the period between the 5th and 14th centuries, a religiously draconian time marked by economic, cultural, and scientific stagnation. The primary historical marker was a shift to organized religions worldwide. 

I am not advocating for the return of the label “Dark Ages,” as I believe labels naturally evolve. This is particularly important when labels carry negative connotations. My argument for adding the adjective “dark” stems from the idea that the worldwide spread of organized religion caused a regression in human thought. Many well-known facts were lost.

Today, when scholars use the term “Dark Ages,” they are usually referring to a period within medieval Europe between 500 CE to 1500 CE. In western Europe, the Church became the dominant gatekeeper of education and acceptable knowledge. Illiteracy was used to control the public. Teach inside the approved framework and you might preserve approved texts. Teach against the approved framework and you could be branded a heretic. At times, that meant prison, torture, or death. That is the darkness I mean: not stupidity, but enforced de-education—the narrowing of public thought under religious power.

Although one force rarely explains a thousand years of history, just as the printing press later changed the world by expanding access to knowledge, organized religion changed the world by controlling the flow of knowledge. 

— map / TST —

Deep-Dive Article: The “Dark” Middle Ages
Michael Alan Prestwood
Author & Natural Philosopher
Prestwood writes on science-first philosophy, with particular attention to the convergence of disciplines. Drawing on his TST Framework, his work emphasizes rational inquiry grounded in empirical observation while engaging questions at the edges of established knowledge. With TouchstoneTruth positioned as a living touchstone, this work aims to contribute reliable, evolving analysis in an emerging AI era where the credibility of information is increasingly contested.
This month @ TST
Column Menu
June 2026
»COLUMN ARCHIVE
Column Research….
1. Timeline Story
Secular Spirituality Settles
2. Linked Quote
“Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.”
3. Science FAQ »
What is the difference between a spiritual and empirical belief?
4. Philosophy FAQ »
What is secular spirituality?
5. Critical Thinking FAQ »
How does spirituality relate to public belief?
6. History FAQ!
Is secular spirituality supported in history and science?
Bonus Deep-Dive Article
The Material-Spiritual Framework: A Philosophy of Spirituality

Comments

Join the Conversation! Currently logged out.
NEW BOOK! NOW AVAILABLE!!

30 Philosophers: A New Look at Timeless Ideas

by Michael Alan Prestwood
The story of the history of our best ideas!
Scroll to Top