Explore Science-first Philosophy

FAQ

Thinking: How does social media fuel the “grass is always greener” problem?

Sun 26 May 2024
Published 2 years ago.
Updated 2 weeks ago.
Related FAQs
Is agnosticism a ludicrous position to occupy?
How do knowledge frameworks help transform information into wisdom?
What is the preservation bias?
Does the border problem contribute to higher crime rates?
How do slippery slope arguments manipulate people?
Why do intelligent people defend bad ideas?
Share :
Email
Print

Thinking: How does social media fuel the “grass is always greener” problem?

Ever scroll through social media and feel like everyone else’s life is a polished vacation while yours is just… regular life? You are not alone. That feeling is not usually a clear reading of reality. It is often a comparison trap fed by representation. Social media gives us a steady stream of curated images, edited moments, and selective stories. In TST terms, we are not seeing reality itself. We are seeing a layer of ideas, images, and presentations built on top of reality.

That is where the problem begins. People usually post the better angles of life: the win, the smile, the trip, the nice dinner, the clean room, the filtered sunset. They do not usually post the boredom, the debt, the argument in the car, the loneliness, or the ordinary Tuesday afternoon when nothing much is happening. So we end up doing something deeply unfair. We compare our lived experience, with all its mess and texture, to someone else’s polished representation.

This is why the “grass is always greener” problem hits so hard. The mind starts mistaking the representation for the whole reality. But it is not the whole reality. It is a selected slice, often shaped for attention, approval, or status. That does not make it fake in every case, but it does make it incomplete. And once we forget that, comparison begins to distort both our thinking and our mood.

From a flourishing point of view, this matters because a life can be good without constantly looking impressive. Flourishing is not the same as performing well online. It has more to do with stability, meaning, relationships, growth, gratitude, and learning how to enjoy the life you actually have. That is why the old Stoic reminder still helps: appreciate what you have now, because there was a time you wished for some of it. Social media can make us chase appearances. Flourishing asks us to come back to reality.

So yes, social media fuels the “grass is always greener” problem. It does so by feeding comparison through selective representation. The cure is not to hate social media, but to remember the split: reality is one thing, the image of reality is another. And confusing the two is where much of the misery begins.

— map / TST —

Michael Alan Prestwood
Author & Natural Philosopher
Prestwood writes on science-first philosophy, with particular attention to the convergence of disciplines. Drawing on his TST Framework, his work emphasizes rational inquiry grounded in empirical observation while engaging questions at the edges of established knowledge. With TouchstoneTruth positioned as a living touchstone, this work aims to contribute reliable, evolving analysis in an emerging AI era where the credibility of information is increasingly contested.
This Week @ TST
April 15, 2026
»Column Archive
WWB Research….
1. Story of the Week
John Snow and the Broad Street Pump
2. Quote of the Week
“A wise man proportions his belief to the evidence.”
3. Science FAQ »
Were dinosaurs Jurassic movie smart?
4. Philosophy FAQ »
How does the idea of Identity in Christ fit within TST?
5. Critical Thinking FAQ »
What is the difference between Public Truth and Public Belief?
6. History FAQ!
Did Einstein’s driver really give one of his early talks?
Bonus Deep-Dive Article
TST Epistemic Calibration: Credence and Degrees of Belief

Comments

Join the Conversation! Currently logged out.
NEW BOOK! NOW AVAILABLE!!

30 Philosophers: A New Look at Timeless Ideas

by Michael Alan Prestwood
The story of the history of our best ideas!
Scroll to Top