Explore Science-first Philosophy

FAQ

Why hasn’t Voyager been damaged by space dust?

Wed 19 Feb 2025
Published 1 year ago.
Updated 3 months ago.
Related FAQs
Did Copernicus prove that Earth moves around the Sun?
What is the farthest object in space?
Does the Fermi paradox lack good thinking?
Share :
Email
Print

Why hasn’t Voyager been damaged by space dust?

Short answer: Space is so vast that the odds of Voyager 1 or 2 hitting something is that rare.

Long answer: The fact is that both do encounter space dust along their journeys. They were designed to endure the impacts of small dust particles of less than 1 mm commonly found in space. It’s also true that hitting a half inch rock would be catastrophic, especially at their high speeds. Voyager 1 is travelling at 17 kilometers per second (38,000 mph), and Voyager 2 at 15 kilometers per second (34,000 mph).

How sparse is space? In between things like comets, space only has a few atoms per cubic meter, typically just a few hydrogen atoms. If space were denser, light would struggle to make it to us. For example, light would be mostly blocked if there were billions of hydrogen atoms per cubic meter, or a mix of many millions of heavier atoms. To compare, air to humans seems transparent, like there’s nothing there. In reality, air has about 25 billion-billions of atoms per cubic meter and we have no trouble seeing light traveling many thousands of miles. To simplify, over the vastness of space, the density of our air would for sure block out distant galaxies. Bottom line, if the Voyager vehicles could travel through air, they can travel through space much easier.

While half inch rocks and even boulders are nearly invisible in space, and there was some question whether either might hit one, space is that vast and they did not. The successful operation of the Voyager spacecraft over decades now serves as practical validation of our understanding.

— map / TST —

Michael Alan Prestwood
Author & Natural Philosopher
Prestwood writes on science-first philosophy, with particular attention to the convergence of disciplines. Drawing on his TST Framework, his work emphasizes rational inquiry grounded in empirical observation while engaging questions at the edges of established knowledge. With TouchstoneTruth positioned as a living touchstone, this work aims to contribute reliable, evolving analysis in an emerging AI era where the credibility of information is increasingly contested.
This Week @ TST
April 8, 2026
»Column Archive
WWB Research….
1. Story of the Week
Pragmatism
2. Quote of the Week
“Our statements about the external world face the tribunal of sense experience not individually, but only as a corporate body.”
3. Science FAQ »
Why do scientific models work if they aren’t literally true?
4. Philosophy FAQ »
Is agnosticism a ludicrous position to occupy?
5. Critical Thinking FAQ »
Do my people and culture help or harm my critical thinking?
6. History FAQ!
Did Berger and Luckmann really say reality is just made up?
Bonus Deep-Dive Article
TST Doxastic Formation: Public Belief, Tribe, and Worldview

Comments

Join the Conversation! Currently logged out.
NEW BOOK! NOW AVAILABLE!!

30 Philosophers: A New Look at Timeless Ideas

by Michael Alan Prestwood
The story of the history of our best ideas!
Scroll to Top