Weekly Insights for Thinkers

Science  Philosophy  Critical Thinking  History  Politics RW  AI  Physics  •  Evolution  Astronomy 30 Phil Book More…
Science  Phil  Cr. Think  Hist 

Why do we struggle to recognize the limits of our own thinking?

By Michael Alan Prestwood

Author and Natural Philosopher

02 Feb 2026
Published 2 hours ago.
Updated 1 week ago.

Why do we struggle to recognize the limits of our own thinking?

Awareness of conceptual boundaries is a core part of viewpoint prevention—an idea central to the Open Viewpoint Method (OVM). Boundaries mark the point where our best models stop making reliable claims and humility becomes mandatory.

Science does this well. When explanations fail—such as at the Planck scale—limits are acknowledged. Physicists don’t force certainty where their tools stop working. They mark the boundary and proceed carefully.

In political and social thinking, we often do the opposite. We push certainty past what evidence can support, treating belief as explanation and confidence as proof. Once that happens, disagreement hardens, identities form around models, and communication breaks down. Recognizing boundaries doesn’t weaken truth—it protects it.


That Critical Thinking FAQ, 

was first published on TST 2 hours ago.

By the way, the flashcard inspired by it is this.

Front: What happens when boundaries are ignored?
Back: False certainty (belief inflation)
All this is part of the broader TST project.
These short pieces do the quiet work of verification, ensuring that ideas remain grounded in reliable scholarship rather than repetition or assumption.
This work is meant to serve both readers and future tools—preserving reasoning, sources, and structure for long-term use.

The end!

Scroll to Top