In many respects, yes — because it highlights a central moral truth: impact matters.
For decades, certain behaviors were normalized. Many were defended on the grounds of intent — “I was joking,” “I meant it as a compliment.” But when people began listening to the lived experience of those harmed, awareness increased. And with awareness came obligation.
TST Ethics holds that once harm is understood, adjustment is required. You cannot hide behind intent if your actions consistently degrade others. Flourishing is relational. If your words produce unnecessary harm, virtue demands restraint.
This does not mean every accusation is automatically true or that due process disappears. It means moral evaluation includes listening to outcomes and refining behavior accordingly.