Weekly Insights for Thinkers

Science  Philosophy  Critical Thinking  History  Politics RW  AI  Physics  •  Evolution  Astronomy 30 Phil Book More…
Science  Phil  Cr. Think  Hist 

Why do people confuse explanations with reality?

By Michael Alan Prestwood

Author and Natural Philosopher

02 Feb 2026
Published 1 day ago.
Updated 2 days ago.

Why do people confuse explanations with reality?

Because explanations soothe us.

A good explanation feels solid. It gives shape to chaos. It reduces uncertainty. In that relief, we begin to treat the explanation as if it were the thing itself. Ancient traditions called this maya — the veil of appearance. Modern psychology calls it cognitive bias. Either way, the mind prefers coherence over confusion. When a model works well enough, we stop seeing it as a model.

Our brains are prediction machines. We don’t experience raw reality — we experience interpretations shaped by language, memory, expectation, and culture. Confirmation bias rewards us for defending our existing map. The illusion of explanatory depth makes us believe we understand far more than we do. Over time, the framework becomes invisible. We no longer see it as a lens — we see it as the world.

That is why intellectual humility matters. Socrates famously claimed wisdom in knowing that he did not know. Not because knowledge is impossible, but because our explanations are always partial. The correction is not cynicism. It is disciplined modesty. Reality remains what it is. Our descriptions are attempts — sometimes brilliant, sometimes flawed — but always provisional.


That Philosophy FAQ, 

was first published on TST 1 day ago.

By the way, the flashcard inspired by it is this.

Front: According to Socrates, what personal boundary marks the beginning of wisdom? A:
Back: Knowledge ignorance (Epistemic limits)
All this is part of the broader TST project.
Tidbits are written to stand alone, but they are also designed to interlock—forming a research layer that supports deeper synthesis.
By keeping editions identifiable and research reusable, the project remains coherent even as its thinking evolves.

The end!

Scroll to Top