Weekly Insights for Thinkers

Science  Philosophy  Critical Thinking  History  Politics RW  AI  Physics  •  Evolution  Astronomy 30 Phil Book More…
Science  Phil  Cr. Thinking  History 

FAQ

Is the Fermi Paradox still relevant?

By Michael Alan Prestwood

Author and Natural Philosopher

Wed 1 Jan 2025
Published 1 year ago.
Updated 2 weeks ago.
Fermi Paradox
Share :

Is the Fermi Paradox still relevant?

Yes—and no. The Fermi Paradox remains a useful framework for discussing the possibility of extraterrestrial life, encouraging us to consider the probabilities and challenges of making contact. It’s a great starting point for exploring the vastness of the universe and our role within it. However, its implied conclusion—that we “should have” seen signs of intelligent life by now—is fatally flawed. This assumption oversimplifies the complexities of interstellar communication and the nature of alien civilizations.

First, the universe is unimaginably vast, and humans have only been broadcasting detectable signals for about a century. These signals have barely traveled 100 light-years in a universe that spans billions of light-years. Expecting contact already assumes that advanced alien civilizations exist within this tiny range, are actively listening, and would prioritize responding to us. It’s more likely that we are in the very early stages of the search, my TST Futurism Timeline puts first contact at about the year 2325, plus or minus a century.

Second, the Paradox often overlooks that alien civilizations might not think or act anything like us. They are not simply advanced humans; their evolution, priorities, and technologies could be incomprehensibly different. To them, humanity might be unremarkable, akin to how we view ants, interesting but not a priority. This anthropocentric bias reveals more about our assumptions than it does about the likelihood of extraterrestrial life.

Earth’s faint signals barely reach our galactic neighborhood, while the universe stretches infinitely beyond. The Fermi Paradox isn’t about alien silence—it’s a humbling reminder of the vastness of space and our early steps in the cosmic conversation.
Michael Alan Prestwood
Author & Natural Philosopher

Prestwood writes on science-first philosophy, with particular attention to the convergence of disciplines. Drawing on his TST Framework, his work emphasizes rational inquiry grounded in empirical observation while engaging questions at the edges of established knowledge. With TouchstoneTruth positioned as a living touchstone, this work aims to contribute reliable analysis in an emerging AI era where the credibility of information is increasingly contested.

WWB Menu
7 Jan 2026
Essay of the Week
The Architecture of Change: Finding Stability in Flux
Story of the Week
Heraclitus
Quote of the Week
“Everything is in flux.”
Weekly Crossroads!
1. Science »
Will the night sky have stars nearly forever?
2. Philosophy »
What does existence before essence mean?
3. Critical Thinking »
Is cause and effect certain?
4. History!
Who were the Presocratic Philosophers?

Comments

Join the Conversation! Currently logged out.
NEW BOOK! NOW AVAILABLE!!

30 Philosophers: A New Look at Timeless Ideas

by Michael Alan Prestwood
The story of the history of our best ideas!
WWB Menu
7 Jan 2026
Essay of the Week
The Architecture of Change: Finding Stability in Flux
Story of the Week
Heraclitus
Quote of the Week
“Everything is in flux.”
Weekly Crossroads!
1. Science »
Will the night sky have stars nearly forever?
2. Philosophy »
What does existence before essence mean?
3. Critical Thinking »
Is cause and effect certain?
4. History!
Who were the Presocratic Philosophers?
Scroll to Top