Explore Science-first Philosophy

National Popular Vote Interstate Compact

By Michael Alan Prestwood

Author and Natural Philosopher

Sat 10 Nov 2018
Published 7 years ago.
Updated 4 weeks ago.
Email
Print

National Popular Vote Interstate Compact

By Michael Alan Prestwood
Sat 10 Nov 2018
3 min read

There are a number of good ideas out there to improve our voting system including the Ranked Choice Ballot. This article focuses on the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact. But first, let’s take a quick look at our form of democracy: Representative Democracy.

Representative Democracy vs Direct Democracy

In a republic like America, laws are made by representatives who are chosen by the people. The new laws must comply with our constitution which specifically protects basic rights of all including the minority. The courts decide if a law is constitutional or not. And, any law can be put up for a vote by the people to make use of direct democracy.

Two examples:

Example 1: CA Gas Tax, An Example of our Democracy at Work

In 2017, the California representatives added a gas tax increase which is representative democracy at work. The next year in 2018, California voted on whether to repeal it or not. The direct democracy voting result kept the new gas tax in place. The California representatives did their job and made a change, someone said heck no, let’s vote. California then voted in a direct democracy vote and the citizens decided to keep the law implemented by their California representatives. Democracy at work, working well.

Example 2: CA Requires Trump Tax Returns to Run

In 2019, California’s Democrat-controlled state Legislature passed a bill that required all presidential contenders to publicly release five years of federal income tax returns or the candidate cannot run on the state’s primary election ballot. The law also required the same for anyone running for the California governorship. The idea was to increase transparency and inform the voters who they are electing to be their representative. There is a reasonable question as to whether this new law is constitutional. In September, 2019, a federal judge ordered a temporary injunction. The new law is going through the courts to see if it is constitutional.

National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC)

The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC) is a plan to turn the presidential election into a national vote if each state adopts it. In this agreement, all the states would award all their respective electoral votes to the popular vote winner of all 50 states. This compact would honor our representative democracy and implement a direct democracy voting mechanism for the highest office in America.

As of this writing in November 2018, 12 states have enacted the bill.

The Math, An Example

CA has a population of 39 million with 55 electoral votes (2 senators + 53 congressman), Wyoming has a population of 579,000 with 3 reps (2 senators + 1 congressman). Each electoral vote in CA represents about 709,000 people and each electoral vote in Wyoming represents about 193,000 people. But, each electoral vote counts the same and each state gets to decide how to divide them up. The fact that 82% of the population resides in cities and suburbs is not currently represented nationally in our democracy.

Keep in mind that the Electoral College is NOT in the Constitution, but was part of the original design. Also, the 12th amendment was ratified in 1804 and forced the states to use the popular vote to divide up electoral votes making it a bit more democratic. Our 3rd president Thomas Jefferson was the first president elected for his second term using our current electoral process.

The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact is an interesting movement and would get around the Constitutional problems, support states rights, and solve the problem. Currently, 12 states have adopted it.

— map / TST —

Michael Alan Prestwood
Author & Natural Philosopher
Prestwood writes on science-first philosophy, with particular attention to the convergence of disciplines. Drawing on his TST Framework, his work emphasizes rational inquiry grounded in empirical observation while engaging questions at the edges of established knowledge. With TouchstoneTruth positioned as a living touchstone, this work aims to contribute reliable, evolving analysis in an emerging AI era where the credibility of information is increasingly contested.
TST Column
April 22, 2026
Column Research….
1. Timeline Story
Augustine of Hippo
2. Linked Quote
“In order for a war to be just, three things are necessary.”
3. Science FAQ »
Why do we overreact and escalate?
4. Philosophy FAQ »
How does TST Ethics handle the trolley problem?
5. Critical Thinking FAQ »
How do you prevent yourself from overreacting?
6. History FAQ!
What is the history of ethical war?
Bonus Deep-Dive Article
1 Goal: Flourish (TST Ethics)

Comments

Join the Conversation! Currently logged out.

Leave a Comment

NEW BOOK! NOW AVAILABLE!!

30 Philosophers: A New Look at Timeless Ideas

by Michael Alan Prestwood
The story of the history of our best ideas!
Scroll to Top