Weekly Insights for Thinkers

Science  Philosophy  Critical Thinking  History  Politics RW  AI  Physics  •  Evolution  Astronomy 30 Phil Book More…
Science  Phil  Cr. Thinking  History 

FAQ

Debating History: Should We Say “Dark Ages” or “Middle Ages?”

By Michael Alan Prestwood

Author and Natural Philosopher

Sun 28 Apr 2024
Published 2 years ago.
Updated 1 month ago.
Epistemology
Share :

Debating History: Should We Say “Dark Ages” or “Middle Ages?”

The correct term to use is “Middle Ages,” or the adjective medieval. The term “Dark Ages” has largely been retired in scholarly circles. Now, I’m actually in the minority on this issue. I think the adjective “dark” was well deserved, especially for Europe. 

Historically, the term Dark Ages was used to describe the period in Europe between the 5th and 14th centuries, a religiously draconian time marked by economic, cultural, and scientific stagnation. The primary historical marker was a shift to organized religions worldwide. While tolerance ebbed and flowed in antiquity, it was a key virtue, especially for the scholarly. However, as our understanding of history has evolved and the focus shifted to a more inclusive worldwide view, so too has our terminology. Most modern historians argue that the term “Dark Ages” is too focused on dark elements in Europe.

I am not advocating for the return of the label “Dark Ages,” as I believe labels naturally evolve. This is particularly important when labels carry negative connotations. My argument for adding the adjective “dark” stems from the idea that the worldwide spread of organized religion caused a regression in human thought. Many well-known facts were lost.

Perhaps I go too far as one element is rarely responsible for worldwide events. However, just as the printing press is a single invention that changed the world, I argue that organized religion did too—and not always for the best. To better understand my view on this “Our Time” debate, take the 15-minute deep dive: The “Dark” Middle Ages.

Michael Alan Prestwood
Author & Natural Philosopher

Prestwood writes on science-first philosophy, with particular attention to the convergence of disciplines. Drawing on his TST Framework, his work emphasizes rational inquiry grounded in empirical observation while engaging questions at the edges of established knowledge. With TouchstoneTruth positioned as a living touchstone, this work aims to contribute reliable analysis in an emerging AI era where the credibility of information is increasingly contested.

WWB Menu
7 Jan 2026
Essay of the Week
The Architecture of Change: Finding Stability in Flux
Story of the Week
Heraclitus
Quote of the Week
“Everything is in flux.”
Weekly Crossroads!
1. Science »
Will the night sky have stars nearly forever?
2. Philosophy »
What does existence before essence mean?
3. Critical Thinking »
Is cause and effect certain?
4. History!
Who were the Presocratic Philosophers?

Comments

Join the Conversation! Currently logged out.
NEW BOOK! NOW AVAILABLE!!

30 Philosophers: A New Look at Timeless Ideas

by Michael Alan Prestwood
The story of the history of our best ideas!
WWB Menu
7 Jan 2026
Essay of the Week
The Architecture of Change: Finding Stability in Flux
Story of the Week
Heraclitus
Quote of the Week
“Everything is in flux.”
Weekly Crossroads!
1. Science »
Will the night sky have stars nearly forever?
2. Philosophy »
What does existence before essence mean?
3. Critical Thinking »
Is cause and effect certain?
4. History!
Who were the Presocratic Philosophers?
Scroll to Top