Explore Science-first Philosophy

FAQ

Debating History: Should We Say “Dark Ages” or “Middle Ages?”

Sun 28 Apr 2024
Published 2 years ago.
Updated 2 weeks ago.
Related FAQs
What is the difference between a true believer, an empiricist, and a true skeptic?
Did Aristotle believe in a soul?
What is the history of Confucianism?
When was the first written language developed?
What Is the first step toward a flourishing life?
Did the Buddha believe in rebirth or reincarnation?
Share :
Email
Print

Debating History: Should We Say “Dark Ages” or “Middle Ages?”

The correct term to use is “Middle Ages,” or the adjective medieval. The term “Dark Ages” has largely been retired in scholarly circles. Now, I’m actually in the minority on this issue. I think the adjective “dark” was well deserved, especially for Europe. 

Historically, the term Dark Ages was used to describe the period in Europe between the 5th and 14th centuries, a religiously draconian time marked by economic, cultural, and scientific stagnation. The primary historical marker was a shift to organized religions worldwide. While tolerance ebbed and flowed in antiquity, it was a key virtue, especially for the scholarly. However, as our understanding of history has evolved and the focus shifted to a more inclusive worldwide view, so too has our terminology. Most modern historians argue that the term “Dark Ages” is too focused on dark elements in Europe.

I am not advocating for the return of the label “Dark Ages,” as I believe labels naturally evolve. This is particularly important when labels carry negative connotations. My argument for adding the adjective “dark” stems from the idea that the worldwide spread of organized religion caused a regression in human thought. Many well-known facts were lost.

Perhaps I go too far as one element is rarely responsible for worldwide events. However, just as the printing press is a single invention that changed the world, I argue that organized religion did too—and not always for the best.

— map / TST —

Deep-Dive Article: The “Dark” Middle Ages
Michael Alan Prestwood
Author & Natural Philosopher
Prestwood writes on science-first philosophy, with particular attention to the convergence of disciplines. Drawing on his TST Framework, his work emphasizes rational inquiry grounded in empirical observation while engaging questions at the edges of established knowledge. With TouchstoneTruth positioned as a living touchstone, this work aims to contribute reliable, evolving analysis in an emerging AI era where the credibility of information is increasingly contested.
This Week @ TST
April 15, 2026
»Column Archive
WWB Research….
1. Story of the Week
John Snow and the Broad Street Pump
2. Quote of the Week
“A wise man proportions his belief to the evidence.”
3. Science FAQ »
Were dinosaurs Jurassic movie smart?
4. Philosophy FAQ »
How does the idea of Identity in Christ fit within TST?
5. Critical Thinking FAQ »
What is the difference between Public Truth and Public Belief?
6. History FAQ!
Did Einstein’s driver really give one of his early talks?
Bonus Deep-Dive Article
TST Epistemic Calibration: Credence and Degrees of Belief

Comments

Join the Conversation! Currently logged out.
NEW BOOK! NOW AVAILABLE!!

30 Philosophers: A New Look at Timeless Ideas

by Michael Alan Prestwood
The story of the history of our best ideas!
Scroll to Top