Absolute Truth

~ < 1 of audio

Speed: 1.00

Author note.

Explore voice = Exploratory style. Very punchy. Personal, and lively using “me,” “you,” “us,” and “I” freely.

I want you to feel me right there with you. We use “I” and “me” and “us” without apology. If the Explain voice is a bridge, the Explore voice is the hike we take across it. It is lively, reflective, and sometimes a bit raw. It is the sound of a shared exploration where I lead you by the hand, but we both discover the view at the same time.

This is where I get to think out loud. Not with definitions, we aren’t just looking at the facts; we are looking at how they feel and what they mean for our lives. I’m talking to you about what I’ve found and what I’m still figuring out. It is engaging because it is real, and it is reflective because it is honest.

The goal is real advice and enjoyable reading. I want to land on something you can actually use. It’s about being direct, being punchy, and making sure that by the time we reach the end of the page, we’ve both found something worth keeping.

And now the piece.

Absolute Truth

The Idea of the Unknowable Dao

New Look

Truth is the successful correspondence between a proposition and reality, and human absolute truths do not exist.

30 Philosophers, Chapter 20, Francis Bacon, Touchstone 49: Absolute Truth.

An absolute truth is a description that is universally consistent with objective reality. Objective reality refers to the material world as it is—reality that exists independently of human thoughts, beliefs, and emotions. This is the metaphysical “split” discussed in the Idea of Ideas, between the Material World and our ideas. The belief in objective reality is the key to science, law, and journalism. And the kicker is that every empirical test performed adds to its validation.

To be clear, absolute truths are not the same as Empirical Ideas. Both objective reality and absolute truths are on the other side of the “split” from our empirical ideas about them. Meaning, absolute truths about objective reality do exist, and our ideas concerning them represent our best descriptions, yet these ideas are still subject to fallibility.

Analysis: This view of absolute truth is extremely similar to Kant’s distinction between phenomena and noumena. Both perspectives recognize an underlying reality beyond human perception. However, while Kant maintains that the noumenal world is ultimately unknowable and only serves as a limiting concept to our understanding, this view asserts that absolute truth exists as the foundation of reality, with our ideas about it being descriptive and subject to continuous refinement.

Here's the key idea. If you embrace that absolute truth exists only in objective reality, then our human claims can remain provisional and always open to refinement, correction, and falsification.

Finally, the core takeaway. Remember absolute truth belongs to the material world as it is. Humans never hold it absolutely. You construct empirical and rational descriptions that align with reality or not, and then you believe each one with a degree of confidence. Each of your claims remains open to testing and revision. Even your strongest conclusions are provisional: true until disproven, not true beyond challenge.

That Critical Thinking Story,

was first published on TST 2 years ago.

The flashcard inspired by it is this.

Front: In the Idea of Ideas, what do we call human descriptions of absolute truths?

Back: Empirical truths.

All this is part of the broader TST project.

Tidbits are the smallest working units of this project—focused facts, stories, or explanations tied directly to evidence and sources.

TouchstoneTruth is designed for rereading and relistening, not for consumption in a single pass.

The end!