Phil • Cr. Think • Science • Hist •
TST PRACTICE

The Philosophy Website

FAQ

Evolution: Why did we start walking upright?

☐ Read
☑ Read
You’ve read this 0 times.
You’ve listened to this 0 times.
Sun 30 Jun 2024
Published 2 years ago.
Updated 9 months ago.
Related FAQs
Did talking our way through life drive a million years of brain growth?
When were toothpicks invented?
Did morality evolve?
What ancient human species first realized it was going to die?
Is the 8.7-million-year-old Anadoluvius a human ancestor?
How did writing first evolve?
Share :
Email
Print

Evolution: Why did we start walking upright?

Why bipedalism?

First, this came about from the following Facebook comment:

My only doubt is the transformation from monkeys. Why would we want to stand erect when we had the ability to climb to reach food in trees?

Answer: Understanding evolution is key, and it’s not a matter of “want.” It’s a series of fortunate accidents—small genetic changes that offer advantages to offspring. Around three to five million years ago, our ancestors, most likely by the genus Australopithecus, began walking upright. Walking upright provided several benefits, such as freeing the hands for carrying tools and food. Bipedalism is also more energy-efficient for long-distance travel, which was crucial as our ancestors moved from trees to open environments. Moreover, standing upright allowed them to see over tall grasses to spot predators and navigate effectively. These combined factors made bipedalism a successful adaptation for our ancestors, aiding in their survival and evolution.

Understanding the evolutionary shift to bipedalism provides you with wisdom about your past, illuminating the context of your journey and the nature of human adaptation.

How did it start? Several theories explain why great apes began walking upright. One theory suggests that bipedalism evolved because it is more energy-efficient than “knuckle-walking.” Another idea is that walking on two legs freed up hands for tasks like gathering food. Some scientists believe it was part of a mutually beneficial arrangement where males gathered food for females and their young in return for exclusive mating. Finally, climate change likely played a role; as forests shrank, hominid ancestors had to walk across grasslands to reach food sources. Those that could walk or run faster were more likely to survive predator attacks.

For more on those early years, take the deep dive, sit back, relax, and explore the human evolution timeline: The Human Evolution Timeline.

— map / TST —

TST Tracker
✓ Reading recorded.
Michael Alan Prestwood
Author & Natural Philosopher
Prestwood writes on science-first philosophy, with particular attention to the convergence of disciplines. Drawing on his TST Framework, his work emphasizes rational inquiry grounded in empirical observation while engaging questions at the edges of established knowledge. With TouchstoneTruth positioned as a living touchstone, this work aims to contribute reliable, evolving analysis in an emerging AI era where the credibility of information is increasingly contested.
The Prestwood Column
Menu
September 2026
Column Research….
1. Timeline Story
Hume’s Is–Ought Problem
2. Linked Quote
“I meet with no proposition that is not connected with an ought, or an ought not.”
3. Science FAQ »
Can science prove flourishing should be our goal?
4. Philosophy FAQ »
What is the difference between a normative aim and a normative directive?
5. Critical Thinking FAQ »
Is flourishing for all just utilitarianism?
6. History FAQ!
What is the history of the idea of flourishing in philosophy?
Bonus Deep-Dive Article
TST Normative Ethics: Flourishing as a Philosophical Goal

Comments

Join the Conversation! Currently logged out.
NEW BOOK! NOW AVAILABLE!!

30 Philosophers: A New Look at Timeless Ideas

by Michael Alan Prestwood
The story of the history of our best ideas!
Scroll to Top