Phil • Cr. Think • Science • Hist • …
TST PRACTICE

By Philosopher Michael Alan Prestwood

Wisdom Builder

Three Tidbit Stories

Topic:
Fungi
Timeless ideas at the intersections of science, philosophy, critical thinking, and history.

Fungi.

3 random tidbit stories in about 3 minutes.

Idea 1.

A Fungi FAQ.

Most of the time groupthink is useful. Your family, your tribe, and the culture itself all carry accumulated wisdom. If you think about it, group ethics is just advice. It coaches you: hey, this way. Don’t steal. Follow the rules. Most of that guidance exists for good reason. But guidance is not the same as authority.

This is where conformity bias sneaks in. When everyone around you agrees, agreement itself starts to feel like evidence. And it’s related to confirmation bias: your mind’s focus on hearing only things that agree with what you already agree with.

All of us are members of multiple tribes; and we want to conform because we want to belong; and that’s why too frequently tribal thinking replaces our own. If your people treat it as normal, questioning it can feel wrong. But watch out. Popularity should not guide how you act. The crowd can carry wisdom, but it can also carry old mistakes. Critical thinking means noticing when the group advice is wrong.

Ultimately, you are your own moral agent. Even when you make decisions with a spouse, you still own your part of the choice. You can listen. You can compromise. But you cannot hand away your responsibility by pointing to everyone else. If the group is wrong, your participation is wrong.

Know when to stop following the crowd. Do listen. The crowd can carry real wisdom. But always judge for yourself. That’s you acting as the moral agent of your life. If your best judgment tells you the group is causing unnecessary harm, choose better. This means you always act with good intent; which is not just a feeling; it requires you to think well. Then watch what happens. Adjust.

Listen to the group. Learn from it. Then decide for yourself.

I wrote that Fungi FAQ, 

and posted it to TST 4 months ago.

 

Idea 2.

A Fungi Story.

13.8 Billion Years Ago: First Millisecond
A bit speculative. Still an irrational idea rationally deduced but with some empirical data.

The Inflationary Epoch was from about 10−36 seconds to or so seconds. Notice the duration label change from “era” to “epoch” and from a narrow time to a range. However, also note that we are still within the first millisecond of the Big Bang. This was a period of extremely rapid expansion driven by a speculative field called inflaton. While the universe did not explode into something, it did increase in size by a huge factor. The very fabric of the universe, space itself, increased in size by a factor of at least 1026, smoothing out any irregularities and leading to the uniformity we observe in the cosmic microwave background. The rapid expansion also drastically cooled the universe.

A bit speculative. Supported by indirect empirical evidence from CMB observations, suggesting a rapid early expansion that explains the universe’s large-scale uniformity and structure distribution.

I wrote that Fungi Story, 

and posted it to TST 3 years ago.

 

Idea 3.

A Fungi TST Term.

The Empiricist is an OVM viewpoint of evidence-calibrated inquiry.

The Empiricist is one of the three OVM viewpoints. It is not a whole-person label or a worldview. It is a viewpoint tool used to understand how a claim looks when confidence is calibrated to support.

The Empiricist viewpoint asks: What is the claim? What supports it? What kind of idea is it? Is it empirical, rational, speculative, personal, symbolic, or disproven? How strong is the evidence? What do good authorities say? What would change my mind?

This viewpoint does not demand perfect certainty before every belief. Everyday life requires provisional trust. The Empiricist can accept reasonable things as true enough for now, especially when they are supported by public knowledge, good authorities, repeated testing, and reality’s pushback. Germs cause disease. Evolution happened. Smoking raises cancer risk. These are not guesses. They are well-supported public truths.

But the Empiricist also remains open to revision. Confidence rises and falls with the quality of support. If the evidence weakens, confidence weakens. If the evidence strengthens, confidence strengthens. The Empiricist does not cling to a claim merely because it feels good, belongs to the tribe, or once seemed reasonable.

In OVM, the Empiricist is the calibrated viewpoint. It is not the middle because it splits the difference between belief and doubt. It is the middle because it tries to avoid both dogmatic belief and chronic rejection. Its discipline is proportional confidence.

I wrote that Fungi TST Term, 

and posted it to TST 5 months ago.

 

The end. Refresh for another set.

Scroll to Top