Phil • Cr. Think • Science • Hist •
TST PRACTICE

The Philosophy Website

FAQ

“Empty is the argument of the philosopher which does not relieve any human suffering.”

☐ Read
☑ Read
You’ve read this 0 times.
You’ve listened to this 0 times.
Wed 4 Sep 2024
Published 2 years ago.
Updated 1 month ago.
Related FAQs
“Nothing is enough for the man to whom enough is too little.”
“People are disturbed not by the things that happen, but by their opinions about the things that happen.”
Is the serenity prayer stoic? “Grant me the serenity…”
“Follow the path of least resistance and live in harmony with the Dao.”
“For the soul is dyed the color of its thoughts.”
“In learning and straightway practicing, is there not pleasure also?”
Share :
Email
Print

“Empty is the argument of the philosopher which does not relieve any human suffering.”

This quote encapsulates the core belief of applied philosophy—the idea that philosophy should have a tangible, beneficial impact on human life. Epicurus, a Greek philosopher from the Hellenistic period, advocated for a life guided by the pursuit of pleasure and the avoidance of pain, but not through indulgence, rather through moderation and wisdom.

It aligns with his philosophy on the practical nature of philosophical inquiry. The quote underscores his belief that philosophy should serve the purpose of easing human suffering, specifically mental and emotional anguish. Epicurus believed that knowledge and wisdom were not merely academic pursuits but tools to achieve ataraxia (peace of mind) and aponia (absence of pain).

This quote is often cited as part of his ethics of happiness and pleasure, where he argued that living a good life involves eliminating fear and unnecessary desires. While no specific written work from Epicurus directly containing this exact wording survives, it fits within the broader context of his letters, notably his Letter to Menoeceus, and his teachings preserved by later followers, including Diogenes Laërtius in Lives of Eminent Philosophers.

— map / TST —

TST Tracker
✓ Reading recorded.
Roman marble copy of a 3rd-century BCE Greek original, likely created before 1st century CE.
Michael Alan Prestwood
Author & Natural Philosopher
Prestwood writes on science-first philosophy, with particular attention to the convergence of disciplines. Drawing on his TST Framework, his work emphasizes rational inquiry grounded in empirical observation while engaging questions at the edges of established knowledge. With TouchstoneTruth positioned as a living touchstone, this work aims to contribute reliable, evolving analysis in an emerging AI era where the credibility of information is increasingly contested.
The Prestwood Column
Menu
September 2026
Column Research….
1. Timeline Story
Hume’s Is–Ought Problem
2. Linked Quote
“I meet with no proposition that is not connected with an ought, or an ought not.”
3. Science FAQ »
Can science prove flourishing should be our goal?
4. Philosophy FAQ »
What is the difference between a normative aim and a normative directive?
5. Critical Thinking FAQ »
Is flourishing for all just utilitarianism?
6. History FAQ!
What is the history of the idea of flourishing in philosophy?
Bonus Deep-Dive Article
TST Normative Ethics: Flourishing as a Philosophical Goal

Comments

Join the Conversation! Currently logged out.
NEW BOOK! NOW AVAILABLE!!

30 Philosophers: A New Look at Timeless Ideas

by Michael Alan Prestwood
The story of the history of our best ideas!
Scroll to Top