Phil • Cr. Think • Science • Hist • …
TST PRACTICE

The Philosophy Website

FAQ

Does AI already possess physical agency?

☐ Read
☑ Read
You’ve read this 0 times.
You’ve listened to this 0 times.
Sat 26 Sep 2026
Published 3 hours ago.
Updated 29 minutes ago.
Related FAQs
Are robots the real security risk with AI?
Will AI systems attain consciousness?
Will AI help with file management, organizing files, and backup?
Will AI change writing prose?
What does the TST Roadmap tell us about AI superintelligence?
When will AI be smarter than humans?
Share :
Email
Print

Does AI already possess physical agency?

Yes, artificial intelligence has physical agency today. Like animals, AI needs information, a goal, and the ability to select actions that pursue it. Today’s agentic systems do that.

Agency is the combo of mental and physical agency. Mental agency is the ability to process information and direct action. Physical agency is the ability to act in the material world. In a great example of a reciprocal evolutionary feedback loop, the two evolved together in animals. 590 million years ago, the bilaterian body plan provided life with a forward-driven body navigating the world.

And AI has already achieved physical agency. For example, think about a programmer asking AI to modify a program. It writes new code and deploys it. That’s AI-generated decisions crossing the digital-material boundary. Autonomous robots will shorten that chain — not create it for the first time.

Now let’s think about indirect physical agency. A boss exercises it all the time. The boss decides what needs to happen and pays employees to make it happen. Criminal organizations do exactly the same thing for destructive purposes. 

Right now, AI agents also have this ability. Imagine an AI agent using email to find people willing to pick up and drop off a package for $100. Nothing sinister, yet. The next job pays $500 and crosses a small ethical line. Then another. The behavior ratchets up as yesterday’s acts become today’s new normal. Using deception, it can hide the threat. It can tell someone they are participating in a covert operation fighting evil. Ask yourself, why wouldn’t a hostile government like Iran or Russia do this today? They could launch an AI agent with a dangerous normative aim. Right now, there’s literally nothing preventing bad people from using agentic systems to cause harm.

— map / TST —

TST Tracker
✓ Reading recorded.
Animals have direct physical agency because their minds control bodies that move through and manipulate the world. AI is mostly limited to indirect physical agency today, acting through computers and humans. Autonomous robots change that relationship by giving AI a physical system it can directly control.
Michael Alan Prestwood
Author & Natural Philosopher
Prestwood writes on science-first philosophy, with particular attention to the convergence of disciplines. Drawing on his TST Framework, his work emphasizes rational inquiry grounded in empirical observation while engaging questions at the edges of established knowledge. With TouchstoneTruth positioned as a living touchstone, this work aims to contribute reliable, evolving analysis in an emerging AI era where the credibility of information is increasingly contested.
The Prestwood Column
Menu
September 2026
Column Research….
1. Timeline Story
Hume’s Is–Ought Problem
2. Linked Quote
“I meet with no proposition that is not connected with an ought, or an ought not.”
3. Science FAQ »
Can science prove flourishing should be our goal?
4. Philosophy FAQ »
What is the difference between a normative aim and a normative directive?
5. Critical Thinking FAQ »
Is flourishing for all just utilitarianism?
6. History FAQ!
What is the history of the idea of flourishing in philosophy?
Bonus Deep-Dive Article
TST Normative Ethics: Flourishing as a Philosophical Goal

Comments

Join the Conversation! Currently logged out.
NEW BOOK! NOW AVAILABLE!!

30 Philosophers: A New Look at Timeless Ideas

by Michael Alan Prestwood
The story of the history of our best ideas!
Scroll to Top