Phil • Cr. Think • Science • Hist • …
TST PRACTICE

The Philosophy Website

TST-SPECIFIC TERM

Open Viewpoint Method

☐ Read
☑ Read
You’ve read this 0 times.
You’ve listened to this 0 times.
Fri 19 Jun 2026
Published 3 months ago.
Updated 3 months ago.
Related Terms
Apathetic Agnostic
State
Rational Pragmatist
Illusion
Unknowable Dao
Empiricist
Share :
Email
Print

Open Viewpoint Method

The Open Viewpoint Method is a thinking tool for exploring ideas from more than one viewpoint.

Open Viewpoint Method, or OVM, helps you notice how different people can look at the same claim and see different things because they are standing in different places.

OVM uses three viewpoints: the True Believer, the Empiricist, and the True Skeptic. These are not fixed identities. They are viewpoint tools. The True Believer viewpoint shows how an idea looks from inside strong commitment. The Empiricist viewpoint asks what evidence, reason, and testing support the claim. The True Skeptic viewpoint asks what has not yet been proven and where doubt remains useful.

This matters because many ideas are emotionally loaded. Religion, politics, science, morality, history, and identity can all trigger defensiveness. OVM gives the mind a calmer path. Instead of asking, “Which side am I on?” it asks, “What does each viewpoint reveal, and what does each viewpoint hide?”

OVM is not about having no beliefs. It is about holding your beliefs with enough openness to learn and discuss. Outside of OVM, simpler topic positions usually work better: believer, agnostic, or skeptic. OVM helps you understand those positions, compare them, and seek truth without letting your current viewpoint become a prison.

— map / TST —

TST Tracker
✓ Reading recorded.
OVM is a linguistic bridge that uses intertwined words and symbols to connect people in serene and sometimes spiritual dialog. On one side is the rational and scientific, across a bridge of respect is the spiritual, unknown, and unknowable.
Michael Alan Prestwood
Author & Natural Philosopher
Prestwood writes on science-first philosophy, with particular attention to the convergence of disciplines. Drawing on his TST Framework, his work emphasizes rational inquiry grounded in empirical observation while engaging questions at the edges of established knowledge. With TouchstoneTruth positioned as a living touchstone, this work aims to contribute reliable, evolving analysis in an emerging AI era where the credibility of information is increasingly contested.
The Prestwood Column
Menu
September 2026
Column Research….
1. Timeline Story
Hume’s Is–Ought Problem
2. Linked Quote
“I meet with no proposition that is not connected with an ought, or an ought not.”
3. Science FAQ »
Can science prove flourishing should be our goal?
4. Philosophy FAQ »
What is the difference between a normative aim and a normative directive?
5. Critical Thinking FAQ »
Is flourishing for all just utilitarianism?
6. History FAQ!
What is the history of the idea of flourishing in philosophy?
Bonus Deep-Dive Article
TST Normative Ethics: Flourishing as a Philosophical Goal

Comments

Join the Conversation! Currently logged out.
NEW BOOK! NOW AVAILABLE!!

30 Philosophers: A New Look at Timeless Ideas

by Michael Alan Prestwood
The story of the history of our best ideas!
Scroll to Top