Phil • Cr. Think • Science • Hist • …
TST PRACTICE

The Philosophy Website

Wisdom Builder

Three Tidbit Stories

Critical Thinking.

3 random tidbit stories in about 3 minutes.

Idea 1.

A Critical Thinking FAQ.

Yes, facts can change minds. While you cannot change someone else’s worldview or identity in a debate, you can persuade a specific belief.

Here’s what scientific studies have shown.

Corrections done right make people more accurate, and no one wants to be wrong. So the realistic goal is not instant conversion. It is helping one idea become a little more aligned with reality. 

When correcting someone, lead with what is true. Keep it simple. Give the evidence and, when needed, explain what actually happened rather than merely saying the original claim is false. Research on misinformation recommends the following:

  1. emphasize anything accurate within the bad argument,
  2. briefly identify the error,
  3. explain why it is wrong,
  4. and then explain the correct explanation.

Giving people a replacement explanation matters because simply removing a false idea can leave a hole that the old story continues to fill.

Also, do not turn the correction into a personal contest. One four-country experiment found that presenting fact-checks as confirmation of what is true, worked better than emphasizing the person is wrong. Other experiments show that simply encouraging people to focus on accuracy can improve their ability to distinguish true from false information. In other words, give the person room to reconsider without demanding that they admit defeat. Don’t overwhelm someone with twenty facts. Focus on correcting one or two at a time, not the person.

Unfortunately, misinformation can remain influential even after correction. Even if they agree in an exchange, their agreement often fades with time. That’s frustrating, but also demonstrates the actual level of influence you have over others.

Explain clearly and let the other person think. Your job is to present reality as clearly as you can. Their job is to decide what to do with it.

I wrote that Critical Thinking FAQ, 

and posted it to TST 2 days ago.

 

Idea 2.

A Critical Thinking Term.

Existence refers to whether or not a thing exists. It is the basic question of being: is this real, or is it only imagined. A tree exists. A fossil exists. A planet exists. But other claims are harder. Does a soul and divine realm exist? Does consciousness exist? Is it only brain activity? Something more?

In traditional philosophy, existence is often contrasted with essence. Existence asks whether something is. Essence asks what something is. For many classical thinkers, essence was central because things like a soul were thought to have a nature, form, and identity. Later existential thinkers reversed the emphasis, especially for human beings. In that view, existence comes first, and essence is shaped through life, choice, action, and meaning.

In TST Philosophy, existence is used carefully. At least in this life, existence does precede essence: we are born into species-level biological structure, but individual identity forms over time through impressions, memory, culture, and choice. TST can identify an existence claim without pretending to define its ultimate nature. Some people believe a soul exists. Some believe consciousness is more than brain activity. Some believe personal existence is created only in this life and ends with the body. TST does not take a final position on speculative claims that exceed public evidence.

This places existence inside the TST metaphysical split. In the material world, existence asks if something is real. In the mind, existence is an idea about whether something exists or not. When a thing exists in the material world and is confirmed, it maps to an empirical idea. When the claim goes beyond public evidence, it is speculative and categorized as irrational. This is how you calibrate belief and hold humility.

I wrote that Critical Thinking Term, 

and posted it to TST 3 months ago.

 

Idea 3.

A Critical Thinking Story.

1000 CE
40 Generations Ago

Spaces between words started circa 1000 CE because those copying texts found it easier and faster to copy if they introduced spaces between words. The 1215 Magna Carta is a good example of this quality of writing which included word-spacing, uppercase, and lowercase, but no punctuation, nor paragraphs. 

I wrote that Critical Thinking Story, 

and posted it to TST 5 years ago.

 

The end. Refresh for another set.

Scroll to Top