Weekly Insights for Thinkers

Science  Philosophy  Critical Thinking  History  Politics RW  AI  Physics  •  Evolution  Astronomy 30 Phil Book More…
Science  Phil  Cr. Thinking  History 

FAQ

Ad hominem: Is it fair to judge a colleague based on how they dress?

By Michael Alan Prestwood

Author and Natural Philosopher

Sun 5 May 2024
Published 2 years ago.
Updated 1 month ago.
Ad Hominem Attack
Share :

Ad hominem: Is it fair to judge a colleague based on how they dress?

Absolutely not! Judging a colleague’s ideas or work based on their attire is like mixing apples with oranges. It’s guilt by association, a form of an ad hominem logical fallacy. Logical fallacies are one of the Four Mind Traps, which are part of the TST Framework.

A colleague’s dress style is like a book cover – it doesn’t dictate the story inside. Remember, a great idea can come from anyone, regardless of their wardrobe choices! Don’t assume a sharp dresser always delivers sharp ideas, or that casual attire means sloppy thinking. Personal style and professional prowess are separate entities. History shows us that innovators in hoodies can revolutionize the world, while some of the worst ideas have come from those in three-piece suits. So, let’s separate style from substance and judge each on its own merit.

By the way, this fallacy extends to following the rules. While adhering to a dress code might show respect for workplace norms, and you might want to punish them for their rebellious idea, don’t. It’s a leap to link someone’s fashion sense, or even their rebellious attitude, directly to their professional capabilities or the brilliance of their ideas. So next time you’re in a meeting, focus on the content spilling from their minds rather than the style of their outfit. 

Ad hominems are a type of logical fallacy. Logical fallacies are one of the Four Mind Traps covered in the TST Framework. Sharpen your on-the-job thinking! Take the 23-minute deep dive: Logical Fallacies Overview 

Michael Alan Prestwood
Author & Natural Philosopher

Prestwood writes on science-first philosophy, with particular attention to the convergence of disciplines. Drawing on his TST Framework, his work emphasizes rational inquiry grounded in empirical observation while engaging questions at the edges of established knowledge. With TouchstoneTruth positioned as a living touchstone, this work aims to contribute reliable analysis in an emerging AI era where the credibility of information is increasingly contested.

WWB Menu
7 Jan 2026
Essay of the Week
The Architecture of Change: Finding Stability in Flux
Story of the Week
Heraclitus
Quote of the Week
“Everything is in flux.”
Weekly Crossroads!
1. Science »
Will the night sky have stars nearly forever?
2. Philosophy »
What does existence before essence mean?
3. Critical Thinking »
Is cause and effect certain?
4. History!
Who were the Presocratic Philosophers?

Comments

Join the Conversation! Currently logged out.
NEW BOOK! NOW AVAILABLE!!

30 Philosophers: A New Look at Timeless Ideas

by Michael Alan Prestwood
The story of the history of our best ideas!
WWB Menu
7 Jan 2026
Essay of the Week
The Architecture of Change: Finding Stability in Flux
Story of the Week
Heraclitus
Quote of the Week
“Everything is in flux.”
Weekly Crossroads!
1. Science »
Will the night sky have stars nearly forever?
2. Philosophy »
What does existence before essence mean?
3. Critical Thinking »
Is cause and effect certain?
4. History!
Who were the Presocratic Philosophers?
Scroll to Top