Explore Science-first Philosophy

FAQ

What is the cherry picking logical fallacy?

Wed 30 Oct 2024
Published 2 years ago.
Updated 1 month ago.
Related FAQs
What is a false choice?
Is the Fermi Paradox still relevant?
How important was the printing press to cultural transmission?
Was Pythagoras’ thinking flawed?
What is the difference between Public Truth and Public Belief?
What is Deception Research?
Share :
Email
Print

What is the cherry picking logical fallacy?

Cherry-picking is when someone focuses only on select pieces of information to support a specific argument or decision, ignoring other relevant or even contradicting data. We all do this sometimes—like choosing to buy something based on a single appealing feature. But there’s a problem: when we ignore the bigger picture, we’re more vulnerable to making biased choices, missing out on essential information.

This fallacy can be especially misleading when it’s done intentionally. Imagine a politician highlighting only the data that fits their agenda, while ignoring facts that might challenge their claims. They’re hoping you’ll focus on that one issue, emotion, or piece of data to sway your opinion. For instance, it’s easy to be drawn to a politician’s stance on a particular issue, like immigration or the economy, without realizing they might be distorting facts through selective data.

Cherry-picking isn’t always negative; sometimes it helps us decide quickly. But it’s still a fallacy. I’m Michael Alan Prestwood, reminding you that the best defense is to verify facts and always keep an eye on the bigger picture.

— map / TST —

Michael Alan Prestwood
Author & Natural Philosopher
Prestwood writes on science-first philosophy, with particular attention to the convergence of disciplines. Drawing on his TST Framework, his work emphasizes rational inquiry grounded in empirical observation while engaging questions at the edges of established knowledge. With TouchstoneTruth positioned as a living touchstone, this work aims to contribute reliable, evolving analysis in an emerging AI era where the credibility of information is increasingly contested.
TST Column
April 22, 2026
Column Research….
1. Timeline Story
Augustine of Hippo
2. Linked Quote
“In order for a war to be just, three things are necessary.”
3. Science FAQ »
Why do we overreact and escalate?
4. Philosophy FAQ »
How does TST Ethics handle the trolley problem?
5. Critical Thinking FAQ »
How do you prevent yourself from overreacting?
6. History FAQ!
What is the history of ethical war?
Bonus Deep-Dive Article
1 Goal: Flourish (TST Ethics)

Comments

Join the Conversation! Currently logged out.
NEW BOOK! NOW AVAILABLE!!

30 Philosophers: A New Look at Timeless Ideas

by Michael Alan Prestwood
The story of the history of our best ideas!
Scroll to Top