Explore Science-first Philosophy

Column Archives
May 2026
»Philosophy of History
Truth in History
22 Apr 2026
»Just War Theory
Trump, The pope, and Just War
15 Apr 2026
»Confidence
Confidence: When Truth Should Inspire Belief
8 Apr 2026
»Personal Belief
On Personal and Group Belief
1 Apr 2026
»Belief
How Truth Relates to Belief
25 Mar 2026
»Truth
Why Truth Requires Reality
18 Mar 2026
»Worldview
Identity and Why Maga went Silent on the War
11 Mar 2026
»Metaphysics
Metaphysics: Remembering the Split
4 Mar 2026
»Science-first Philosophy
Science-First Philosophy: A Better Way to Live
25 Feb 2026
»Political Identity
Analysis of the Understanding MAGA Series
18 Feb 2026
»Models
Framework Models and How They Mislead
11 Feb 2026
»Authority
Weber, Authority, and Why Judgment Fails
4 Feb 2026
»Boundaries
Planck, MAGA, and the Edge of Communication
28 Jan 2026
»Law Enforcement
John Locke and the Limits of Law Enforcement
21 Jan 2026
»Societal Blindness
Copernicus, Societal Blindness, and Worldview
14 Jan 2026
»Eternal Recurrence
Nietzsche: If You Had to Live This Year Forever
7 Jan 2026
»Flux
Heraclitus and the Architecture of Change

THIS ISSUE: Just War Theory.

TST Column
22 Apr 2026
TST Column
Apr 2026
Situational ethics asks what we should do when no option feels morally clean, and Just War Theory is one of its clearest examples.
AUDIO
Listen to the column, or the research behind it.
Column 3 of 7 in the Understanding Ethics series.
How we should live.

Column Research

Stories: Science Philosophy Critical Thinking History Big Bang Metaphysics Evolution Biases Futurism Ancient History Ethics Reasoning

1 Essay + 6 Tidbits
1 Focus
Plus a bonus deep-dive article.
This Issue:
— Just War Theory —
Just war theories use situational ethics to place moral limits on war, avoid its worst horrors, and establish when war is justified.
Greetings!

This is the last weekly TST Column. Starting May 1, the column moves to a monthly rhythm. I’ve kept the weekly pace up for several months, and I’m grateful for what it has produced, but it has also been exhausting. Writing a thoughtful column every week is one thing. Having the time to fully support it, share it, and let it live is another. More than that, the weekly pace has begun to pull time and energy away from the rest of my 30-series books, and those books matter deeply to me. They are the larger home for many of the ideas I most want to finish and share. So this change is not about doing less. It is about making each column stronger, while creating more room for the deeper work ahead. Thank you for being here with me.

Over the coming months, I’ll publish one more column in the Understanding Philosophy series, then begin the Understanding Ethics series. This column is the first in that new ethics arc, moved to the front because it felt timely. Trump’s war with Iran and his feud with Pope Leo XIV over war, peace, and Just War Theory suddenly made an old ethical question feel very current. Reuters covered the dispute in mid-April, and Vatican-linked coverage, along with the U.S. bishops, addressed the Just War issue directly. That also makes this a fitting follow-up to our recent columns on truth, belief, and confidence, because before we judge war, we first have to judge the claims, evidence, and authorities surrounding it

–Michael Alan Prestwood
6 Research Tidbits
Wisdom Builder Crossroads
The research, stories, and questions that inform this issue.

1 Story »

Augustine of Hippo
born 354
Lived from 354 to 430 CE, aged about 76.
Life is full of hard choices. In situational ethics, clear-cut right and wrong tend to give way to reducing harm or choosing the lesser of two evils.

2 Quote »

“In order for a war to be just, three things are necessary.”
Situational ethics, like Just War Theory, can be brought down to your life. When you cannot turn the other cheek, strive for a response that is proportionate and never exceeds the harm done.

3 Science »

Why do we overreact and escalate?
When emotion rises, pause long enough to ask whether your response fits the situation and helps make things better.

4Philosophy »

How does TST Ethics handle the trolley problem?
When an ethical problem feels impossible, slow down, weigh options intent and use the good intent-good result formula to choose the option that causes less harm to you first, and then to others.

5Critical Thinking »

How do you prevent yourself from overreacting?
During conflict, shift from justifying your intent to asking what result you actually want.

6History!

What is the history of ethical war?
The history of war ethics shows that across time and cultures, people have tried to define when war is justified and how it should be restrained.
Take the deep dive.
Linked Article
Philosophy
Article
1 Goal: Flourish (TST Ethics)
TST Ethics
Flourishing requires calibration. TST Ethics integrates intent, consequence, proportionality, and systemic impact within a two-layer reality. It respects law, reduces harm, and refines responsibility as awareness grows. Personal morality and group ethics are not separate domains — they are scaled expressions of fairness lived within real constraints.
That’s the whole rhythm!
First of the month – 3PM:
Next set drops here.
:
:
:
Next day – 3PM PST:
WWB Research Emailed.
:
:
:
© TouchstoneTruth.com
Scroll to Top