Phil • Cr. Think • Science • Hist • …
TST PRACTICE

By Philosopher Michael Alan Prestwood

Wisdom Builder

Three Tidbit Stories

Topic:
Structure

Speculative ideas about the deeper patterns shaping the universe.

Structure.

3 random tidbit stories in about 3 minutes.

Idea 1.

A Structure FAQ.

Right now, with the galactic material we can observe, it appears the universe is on a path to a “Big Freeze.” This is a depressing thought, but you have to remember this is speculation. We really just don’t know.

There are currently three categories of models that describe the movement of the universe: Lambda Cold Dark Matter theory, Big Rip, and Big Crunch. These three are centered around the strength of gravity and whether or not it will overpower the expanding universe. Essentially, the Lambda Cold Dark Matter theory, the leading theory, describes a universe where the expansion wins, a universe that expands forever, ultimately ending in a Big Freeze.

Right now, based on our limited observations and knowledge, one of our best guesses is that the universe ends in a Big Freeze. Right now, with what we know, we need more galactic material for this not to be true.

I wrote that Structure FAQ, 

and posted it to TST 3 years ago.

 

Idea 2.

A Structure FAQ.

Yes—but he didn’t know it.

Here’s that story.

In 1941, Canadian astronomer Andrew McKellar made a strange discovery. Studying the light from interstellar gas—specifically cyanogen molecules—he calculated that this cold material was absorbing energy as if bathed in radiation just 2.3 degrees above absolute zero.

That number should sound familiar: the modern measurement of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) is 2.725 K.

In other words, McKellar heard the whisper of the Big Bang—but didn’t know what he was hearing. The idea of a hot, expanding universe was still fringe. Lemaître had floated the “primeval atom,” but few paid attention. So McKellar noted the oddity, published it quietly, and moved on.

Fast forward to 1965.

At Bell Labs, radio engineers Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson were just trying to get rid of a mysterious hiss in their antenna. They cleaned it. Rewired it. Even cleared out the pigeons. But the hiss stayed. Eventually, they connected with a team at Princeton—Robert Dicke’s group—who were looking for the Big Bang’s afterglow.

And just like that, the cosmic whisper became a cosmic shout.

Here’s the twist: Penzias and Wilson won the Nobel Prize in 1978. McKellar got nothing. Even though his data had already measured the universe’s background radiation, he didn’t know what it meant—and no one else connected the dots.

He was one insight—one conversation—away from a Nobel.

And that’s the real lesson. Science isn’t just about seeing something strange. It’s about seeing it and knowing what it means.

Science does not always begin the same way. Sometimes it begins with a a new way to imagine reality. Other times, it begins with a new observation: a number that does not fit, a signal that will not go away, a whisper in the data. Scientific progress happens when the two finally meet.

I wrote that Structure FAQ, 

and posted it to TST 3 months ago.

 

Idea 3.

A Structure Term.

A social construct is a shared human-made idea that organizes life. 

Chapter 10 of 30 Philosophers defines it this way:

“A Social Construct is a shared non-natural belief; created and maintained by groups; and they shape reality.”

They are the rules created and maintained by people. A social construct is not a natural object like a mountain, tree, or star, but it can still shape reality in powerful ways. Things like money, ownership, and law all depend on shared understanding. If enough people accept and maintain the construct, it becomes part of how life is organized.

In TST, Social Constructs are one of the Five Thought Tools of the TST Framework, the Think Well path of TST Philosophy. The goal is not to dismiss them, but to see them clearly. TST focuses on 10 core social constructs: language, names, base-10, zero, time, calendars, ownership, money, musical notation, and IQ. The better you understand these constructed systems, the better you can use them in your thinking.

Metaphysically, social constructs belong on the Ideas side of the split. They are rational ideas: indirect organizing structures built from human thought. They organize empirical reality. Money is the perfect example. The paper, coin, or digital record exists in the material world, but the value comes from a shared rational framework. Social constructs show how ideas can be non-material yet still real enough to move people, shape societies, and guide behavior.

I wrote that Structure Term, 

and posted it to TST 5 months ago.

 

The end. Refresh for another set.

Scroll to Top