If reality exists independently of us, the next question follows naturally: what does it mean for a belief to be true? This week builds directly on the split. Truth requires reality — something beyond preference or narrative. But acknowledging that does not grant us certainty. TST holds a disciplined position: truth without certainty, correspondence without illusion. We aim at reality, even knowing we may revise tomorrow.
»Column Archive
THIS ISSUE: Truth.
Last updated 3 months ago.
Column Archives
TST Column
25 Mar 2026
TST Column
Mar 2026
THIS ISSUE: Truth.
Truth requires alignment with reality.
LISTEN NOW!
Listen to the column, or the research behind it.
Understanding Philosophy
Thread
Column 3 of 6 in the Understanding Philosophy series.
EXPLORE: An introduction to science-first philosophy.
Column Research
Stories: Science Philosophy Critical Thinking History Big Bang Metaphysics Evolution Biases Futurism Ancient History Ethics Reasoning
1 Essay + 6 Tidbits
1 Focus
Plus a bonus deep-dive article.
This Issue:
— Truth —
Truth requires alignment with reality.
Greetings!
–Michael Alan Prestwood
6 Research Tidbits
Wisdom Builder Crossroads
The research, stories, and questions that inform this issue.
1 Story »
Absolute Truth
If you embrace that absolute truth exists only in objective reality, then our human claims can remain provisional and always open to refinement, correction, and falsification.
2 Quote »
“The Dao that can be told is not the eternal Dao; The name that can be named is not the eternal name.”
- Laozi
- circa 550 BCE
Laozi opens the Dao De Jing by reminding us that ultimate reality cannot be captured by words, names, or ideas. He opens with the split.
3 Science »
Why do scientific models work if they aren’t literally true?
Scientific models succeed not because they are perfectly true, but because they reliably capture patterns in reality. Trust scientific models for what they do well, but do not mistake them for reality itself.
4Philosophy »
Does Agrippa’s Trilemma Disprove the Idea of Ideas?
Agrippa’s Trilemma does not break the Idea of Ideas. It helps show why we need a clear split between reality itself and our human ideas about it.
5Critical Thinking »
How do I know what is true and what is just an opinion?
Evidence. Inductive reasoning is evidence based; abductive reasoning is a best guess from limited evidence.
6History!
Is Philo’s interpretation related to the split in the Idea of Ideas?
Practice allegorical reading of the stories you encounter, including scripture. Allegory deepens your thinking ability. See the deeper awareness under the text.
Take the deep dive.
Linked Article
Philosophy
Paper
TST Theory of Truth: Reality-First Correspondence
TST Philosophy
Truth is not negotiable. Our descriptions are. Truth happens when a proposition aligns with how things actually are — not when it feels coherent, useful, or widely accepted. Coherence constrains thinking. Pragmatism tests survival. But correspondence anchors everything. We aim at the world; we do not create it.