Phil • Cr. Think • Science • Hist •
TST PRACTICE

The Philosophy Website

STORY

Bad Act: Trump Tells Russia 2016 Election Interference OK!

☐ Read
☑ Read
You’ve read this 0 times.
You’ve listened to this 0 times.

By PrestwoodIT

Fri 27 Sep 2019
Published 7 years ago.
Updated 5 months ago.
Related Stories
Crime: Donald Trump, Jr. Tells Russia, “I love it”
Crime: Flynn Asks Russia to Ignore the Current President
Trump Blackmails Ukraine President
Crime: Roger Stone Begins Communicating with Guccifer 2.0
Crime: Manafort Colluded and Conspired with Russia!
Crime: Russia Buys Pro-Trump, Anti-HRC Ads
Share :

Bad Act: Trump Tells Russia 2016 Election Interference OK!

Not a crime, but a bad act: Trump met with Lavrov and Kislyak in the oval office. We know because Russia reported this meeting. The Trump administration did not document this meeting. In the meeting, Trump told Russia he didn’t mind their 2016 Election Interference because America has interfered in other country’s elections. This is the same meeting where Trump told them that firing Comey took the pressure off.

Unverified Reporting: Washington Post reported on 9/27/2019 this news based on 3 former officials. They also reported that the documenting of this meeting was kept secret.

Mueller Note: Why didn’t Mueller discover this bad act?

— map / TST —

TST Tracker
✓ Reading recorded.
Michael Alan Prestwood
Author & Natural Philosopher
Prestwood writes on science-first philosophy, with particular attention to the convergence of disciplines. Drawing on his TST Framework, his work emphasizes rational inquiry grounded in empirical observation while engaging questions at the edges of established knowledge. With TouchstoneTruth positioned as a living touchstone, this work aims to contribute reliable, evolving analysis in an emerging AI era where the credibility of information is increasingly contested.
Email
Print
The Prestwood Column
Menu
September 2026
Column Research….
1. Timeline Story
Hume’s Is–Ought Problem
2. Linked Quote
“I meet with no proposition that is not connected with an ought, or an ought not.”
3. Science FAQ »
Can science prove flourishing should be our goal?
4. Philosophy FAQ »
What is the difference between a normative aim and a normative directive?
5. Critical Thinking FAQ »
Is flourishing for all just utilitarianism?
6. History FAQ!
What is the history of the idea of flourishing in philosophy?
Bonus Deep-Dive Article
TST Normative Ethics: Flourishing as a Philosophical Goal

Comments

Join the Conversation! Currently logged out.

Leave a Reply

NEW BOOK! NOW AVAILABLE!!

30 Philosophers: A New Look at Timeless Ideas

by Michael Alan Prestwood
The story of the history of our best ideas!
Scroll to Top