Explore Science-first Philosophy

FAQ

What is the history behind quantum mechanics?

Fri 27 Feb 2026
Published 2 months ago.
Updated 1 week ago.
Related FAQs
Is the Big Bang singularity scientific or philosophical?
How did Copernicus show both the power and limits of models?
Has Planck’s Constant been updated?
Is the idea of superposition multiple states irrational?
Should you engage Trump supporters?
Can you explain the Big Freeze, Big Rip, and Big Crunch Ideas?
Share :
Email
Print

What is the history behind quantum mechanics?

Here is the history of quantum mechanics in one minute.

Before 1687, before Newton, we observed and described gravity, but we described falling objects and celestial motion as separate things. Newton’s brilliance was unifying gravity as a universal force governing both apples and planets. He gave us precise math that let us land on the Moon. These descriptions appeared so complete, we still call them laws today.

In 1916, Einstein came along and did the impossible, he broke Newton’s laws. He replaced Newton’s force with a property of space itself. Gravity is the curvature of space-time and everywhere all at once and changes do not reach across the universe instantly, they travel at the speed of light. If the Sun vanished, we would feel and see it about 8 minutes later. 

In the 1920s, quantum mechanics emerged to describe small-scale stuff. We started confirming observations, but could not explain them well. In the 1930s, Heisenberg and Bohr noted inconsistencies between General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics. The kicker? To this day, no one can reconcile these inconsistencies. The quantum mechanics era of physics is filled with speculation. How long will it take for us to explain it all well? Einstein tried and failed. He passed in 1955. Countless others tried too. Is the next Einstein even born yet? 

I have no doubt we will unify our descriptions. Afterall, they are only descriptions, not reality itself. We are simply looking for a way to describe and predict all observations. I’m confident we can come up with a unified description. A model that may be more like an analogy, but it will describe and predict all our scientific observations.

— map / TST —

Our understanding of gravity is still incomplete and a future unified theory that explains and predicts all observations well still awaits.
Michael Alan Prestwood
Author & Natural Philosopher
Prestwood writes on science-first philosophy, with particular attention to the convergence of disciplines. Drawing on his TST Framework, his work emphasizes rational inquiry grounded in empirical observation while engaging questions at the edges of established knowledge. With TouchstoneTruth positioned as a living touchstone, this work aims to contribute reliable, evolving analysis in an emerging AI era where the credibility of information is increasingly contested.
This Week @ TST
April 8, 2026
»Column Archive
WWB Research….
1. Story of the Week
Pragmatism
2. Quote of the Week
“Our statements about the external world face the tribunal of sense experience not individually, but only as a corporate body.”
3. Science FAQ »
Why do scientific models work if they aren’t literally true?
4. Philosophy FAQ »
Is agnosticism a ludicrous position to occupy?
5. Critical Thinking FAQ »
Do my people and culture help or harm my critical thinking?
6. History FAQ!
Did Berger and Luckmann really say reality is just made up?
Bonus Deep-Dive Article
TST Doxastic Formation: Public Belief, Tribe, and Worldview

Comments

Join the Conversation! Currently logged out.
NEW BOOK! NOW AVAILABLE!!

30 Philosophers: A New Look at Timeless Ideas

by Michael Alan Prestwood
The story of the history of our best ideas!
Scroll to Top