Phil • Cr. Think • Science • Hist •
TST PRACTICE

The Philosophy Website

FAQ

Did most humans live in caves 30,000 years ago?

☐ Read
☑ Read
You’ve read this 0 times.
You’ve listened to this 0 times.
Wed 14 Aug 2024
Published 2 years ago.
Updated 2 months ago.
Related FAQs
What is the difference between a heuristic and a cognitive bias?
Can a fat, out of shape person give valid nutritional advice?
Does the Fermi paradox lack good thinking?
How far back do oral traditions date?
Did Einstein’s driver really give one of his early talks?
Do aliens enjoy playing like we do on Earth?
Share :
Email
Print

Did most humans live in caves 30,000 years ago?

No, no, no! Despite the popular image, humans did not primarily live in caves. Caves preserve artifacts well, so a non-critical view at the data paints an image of cave life. However, while caves were often used for things like temporary shelter, rituals, or as storage, most humans did not live their lives in them. They built shelters that were more comfortable and practical for daily living. Built out of materials like wood and animal hides, they decomposed over time, rarely leaving a single trace.

Our bias toward preserved things is known as the preservation bias. It is a cognitive bias and, in this case, a Cro-Magnon stereotype too. Our biases and stereotypes are two of the Four Mind Traps.

The insightful take-away here is to realize this applies to all hominins going back 3 million years. When you see a documentary about a neanderthal cave, realize that almost for sure, right outside that cave or nearby were several huts, perhaps even dozens. While no one would call these cities, they were proto-cities, villages if you will. At times, they were stable for generations too! So, the new image shifts toward communal living in huts with communal fire pits. We even have evidence of tool-making areas, and they likely built huts to store extra food they “gathered” and “hunted.” Perhaps they had a hut for storing cleaned bones, and another for hides. While these raw materials would not facilitate a modern life, they sure did come in handy. Imagine a bustling hub of activity, children playing, and elders sharing stories. It’s a vision of our ancestors far removed from the solitary cave dweller stereotype. 

— map / TST —

TST Tracker
✓ Reading recorded.
Michael Alan Prestwood
Author & Natural Philosopher
Prestwood writes on science-first philosophy, with particular attention to the convergence of disciplines. Drawing on his TST Framework, his work emphasizes rational inquiry grounded in empirical observation while engaging questions at the edges of established knowledge. With TouchstoneTruth positioned as a living touchstone, this work aims to contribute reliable, evolving analysis in an emerging AI era where the credibility of information is increasingly contested.
The Prestwood Column
Menu
September 2026
Column Research….
1. Timeline Story
Hume’s Is–Ought Problem
2. Linked Quote
“I meet with no proposition that is not connected with an ought, or an ought not.”
3. Science FAQ »
Can science prove flourishing should be our goal?
4. Philosophy FAQ »
What is the difference between a normative aim and a normative directive?
5. Critical Thinking FAQ »
Is flourishing for all just utilitarianism?
6. History FAQ!
What is the history of the idea of flourishing in philosophy?
Bonus Deep-Dive Article
TST Normative Ethics: Flourishing as a Philosophical Goal

Comments

Join the Conversation! Currently logged out.
NEW BOOK! NOW AVAILABLE!!

30 Philosophers: A New Look at Timeless Ideas

by Michael Alan Prestwood
The story of the history of our best ideas!
Scroll to Top