Weekly Insights for Thinkers

Science  Philosophy  Critical Thinking  History  Politics RW  AI  Physics  •  Evolution  Astronomy 30 Phil Book More…
Science  Phil  Cr. Think  Hist 

QUOTE

“The Dao that can be told is not the eternal Dao; The name that can be named is not the eternal name.”
Unknowable Dao
Share :

Mike's Takeaway:

Quote context: Likely compiled after 400 BCE. Laozi likely lived more than a century before.
Source: The Dao De Jing, translated from Chapter 1.
Current Reference: In chapter 3 of the book “30 Philosophers.”

This quote, a translation from the opening line of the Dao De Jing has intrigued philosophers for centuries and highlights a central Daoist belief: the universe, or the Dao, is ultimately unknowable and beyond words.

Laozi’s teaching of the “unknowable Dao” resonates through time as a reminder of the limits of human understanding. It’s a skeptical idea that we cannot fully grasp the true nature of reality. No matter how much we learn, there will always be aspects of the universe that lie beyond our comprehension.

Consider, for instance, the concept of visible and non-visible light. We perceive visible light and might think it’s the whole spectrum, but science tells us it’s just a small fraction of what’s out there. Our brains filter and interpret the world, creating a version of reality that feels complete but is only a shadow of what truly exists.

Even something as simple as water can illustrate Laozi’s point. Water can be described as a necessity for life, a molecule by chemists, or even as a source of play for children. Yet, no matter how detailed our descriptions, they always fall short of capturing the essence of what water truly is. Words, like names, only scratch the surface of reality.

Laozi reminds us that the universe will always remain shrouded in mystery. While we can pursue the unknown, the unknowable will forever evade our understanding. As he wisely said,

“The Dao that can be told is not the eternal Dao.”

Analysis By Michael Alan Prestwood
01 Jan 2026
Published 1 year ago.
Updated 3 weeks ago.
Michael Alan Prestwood
Author & Natural Philosopher
Prestwood writes on science-first philosophy, with particular attention to the convergence of disciplines. Drawing on his TST Framework, his work emphasizes rational inquiry grounded in empirical observation while engaging questions at the edges of established knowledge. With TouchstoneTruth positioned as a living touchstone, this work aims to contribute reliable, evolving analysis in an emerging AI era where the credibility of information is increasingly contested.
TST Weekly Column
January 21, 2026
This Week:
»Edition Archive
The column…
Copernicus, Societal Blindness, and Worldview
WWB Research….
1. Story of the Week
Nicolas Copernicus
2. Quote of the Week
“The movement of the planets agrees best with actual observations.”
3. Science FAQ »
Did Copernicus prove that Earth moves around the Sun?
4. Philosophy FAQ »
Did Copernicus remove humanity from the center of the universe?
5. Critical Thinking FAQ »
Why do intelligent people defend bad ideas?
6. History FAQ!
Was Copernicus famous during his life?
Bonus Deep-Dive Article
The Universe Before the Telescope

Comments

Join the Conversation! Currently logged out.

Leave a Reply

Recent Quotes
2. Quote of the Week
“The movement of the planets agrees best with actual observations.”
2. Quote of the Week
Could you affirm your life so fully that you would will its eternal repetition?
2. Quote of the Week
“Everything is in flux.”
2. Quote of the Week
“I have a worldview. So do you.”
2. Quote of the Week
“Nothing is enough for the man to whom enough is too little.”
Scroll to Top