Phil • Cr. Think • Science • Hist •
TST PRACTICE

The Philosophy Website

QUOTE

“I was not; I was; I am not; I do not mind.”
☐ Read
☑ Read
You’ve read this 0 times.
You’ve listened to this 0 times.
Related Quotes
“In order for a war to be just, three things are necessary.”
“Where ignorance is bliss, ’tis folly to be wise.”
“Nothing is enough for the man to whom enough is too little.”
Frameworks vary, but reality does not.
“Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.”
“We are all tattooed in our cradles with the beliefs of our tribe.”
Share :
Email
Print

Mike's Takeaway:

Sometime before 270 BCE, Epicurus had the following thought which marks the outline of everyone’s unique journey.

“I was not; I was; I am not; I do not mind.”

This thought is used in chapter 11 of “30 Philosophers” to explore epicurean thoughts on our fear of death. It reflects that death is either not relevant to us because we are alive, or it is not something we can experience because we are dead. Therefore, there is no reason to fear death or to be anxious about the possibility of not existing after death. This idea marks the outline of our sentient journey.

The following is sometimes labelled the “Epicurus Epitaph,” though no tombstone of his is known to have had this inscription. In a letter to Menoeceus about 300 BCE, translated from Greek, Epicurus wrote,

“Death does not concern us, because as long as we exist, death is not here. And when it does come, we no longer exist.”

It succinctly summarize his teachings on death. When the conversation gets around to someone expressing fear in not existing, I introduce this idea as a talking point in chapter 11. I don’t claim it’s for everyone, just a perspective worth contemplating which can help with the fear of death.

Analysis By Michael Alan Prestwood
07 Jul 2026
Published 2 years ago.
Updated 2 months ago.
TST Tracker
✓ Reading recorded.
Roman marble copy of a 3rd-century BCE Greek original, likely created before 1st century CE.
Michael Alan Prestwood
Author & Natural Philosopher
Prestwood writes on science-first philosophy, with particular attention to the convergence of disciplines. Drawing on his TST Framework, his work emphasizes rational inquiry grounded in empirical observation while engaging questions at the edges of established knowledge. With TouchstoneTruth positioned as a living touchstone, this work aims to contribute reliable, evolving analysis in an emerging AI era where the credibility of information is increasingly contested.
The Prestwood Column
Menu
September 2026
Column Research….
1. Timeline Story
Hume’s Is–Ought Problem
2. Linked Quote
“I meet with no proposition that is not connected with an ought, or an ought not.”
3. Science FAQ »
Can science prove flourishing should be our goal?
4. Philosophy FAQ »
What is the difference between a normative aim and a normative directive?
5. Critical Thinking FAQ »
Is flourishing for all just utilitarianism?
6. History FAQ!
What is the history of the idea of flourishing in philosophy?
Bonus Deep-Dive Article
TST Normative Ethics: Flourishing as a Philosophical Goal

Comments

Join the Conversation! Currently logged out.

Leave a Reply

NEW BOOK! NOW AVAILABLE!!

30 Philosophers: A New Look at Timeless Ideas

by Michael Alan Prestwood
The story of the history of our best ideas!
Scroll to Top