Fear-based ethics refers to moral systems that use the fear of consequences to guide behavior. Think of Karma or God’s wrath! Under these systems, actions are judged by punishment. With Divine Command Theory, good deeds are judged by God: you don’t murder someone simply because “God says murder is wrong.” With Karma, good acts in this life are done to avoid rebirth as something lowly, like a dung beetle, in the next.
In these systems, morality becomes less about values and more about consequences. One of the problems with this approach is that it doesn’t hold up when fear fades—when someone is no longer afraid of the consequences or loses faith. This emphasis on punishment creates a framework where ethical decisions rely heavily on fear, often leaving individuals morally adrift when fear or faith falters.
The solution to this dilemma is simple: focus on the reasons why these punishments were ever deemed necessary. For religious teachings, this means encouraging followers to strive for good karma or obey God’s words but also understanding the underlying wisdom in these moral commands.
This shift in focus moves the emphasis from punishment to the reasons one wouldn’t want to commit harmful acts in the first place. With an understanding of why an action is deemed wrong—avoiding harm, maintaining harmony, promoting empathy—one can build a more grounded moral compass based on genuine understanding, not fear.