Explore Science-first Philosophy

FAQ

If your friends are bad, are you bad?

Sun 7 Jul 2024
Published 2 years ago.
Updated 3 weeks ago.
Related FAQs
Why do scientific models work if they aren’t literally true?
Is it fair to judge a colleague based on how they dress?
What is a straw man fallacy and how can I avoid it?
Is anecdotal evidence ever useful to prove something?
Why do we struggle to recognize the limits of our own thinking?
What is the cherry picking logical fallacy?
Share :
Email
Print

If your friends are bad, are you bad?

No, having bad friends or working for a controversial company does not automatically make someone bad. Well, at least that’s the consensus. However, your mother is still correct when she tells you to hang around with good people, because fair or not, people judge.

This is an example of the guilt by association fallacy, which unfairly judges individuals based on their associations rather than their personal actions and character. People may work in industries like big oil, big tobacco, or even controversial companies like Walmart for various reasons, including economic necessity, personal career goals, or a desire to effect change from within. It’s essential to evaluate a person’s actions and beliefs independently, rather than making assumptions based on their employer. Always seek evidence of an individual’s own behavior and contributions before forming a judgment.

Now, if someone is associated with bad people, companies, or anything controversial, it’s reasonable to use that association as a starting point for further investigation. However, it’s important to keep an open mind and avoid jumping to conclusions. Associations can be complex and multifaceted, and a deeper understanding of the context and the individual’s motivations and actions is necessary before making any judgments. This approach ensures a fair and balanced evaluation based on evidence rather than assumptions.

— map / TST —

Michael Alan Prestwood
Author & Natural Philosopher
Prestwood writes on science-first philosophy, with particular attention to the convergence of disciplines. Drawing on his TST Framework, his work emphasizes rational inquiry grounded in empirical observation while engaging questions at the edges of established knowledge. With TouchstoneTruth positioned as a living touchstone, this work aims to contribute reliable, evolving analysis in an emerging AI era where the credibility of information is increasingly contested.
TST Weekly Column
April 15, 2026
»Column Archive
WWB Research….
1. Story of the Week
John Snow and the Broad Street Pump
2. Quote of the Week
“A wise man proportions his belief to the evidence.”
3. Science FAQ »
Were dinosaurs Jurassic movie smart?
4. Philosophy FAQ »
How does the idea of Identity in Christ fit within TST?
5. Critical Thinking FAQ »
What is the difference between Public Truth and Public Belief?
6. History FAQ!
Did Einstein’s driver really give one of his early talks?
Bonus Deep-Dive Article
TST Epistemic Calibration: Credence and Degrees of Belief

Comments

Join the Conversation! Currently logged out.
NEW BOOK! NOW AVAILABLE!!

30 Philosophers: A New Look at Timeless Ideas

by Michael Alan Prestwood
The story of the history of our best ideas!
Scroll to Top