Phil • Cr. Think • Science • Hist •

The Philosophy Website

Wisdom Builder

Three Tidbit Stories

Plants.

3 random tidbit stories in about 3 minutes.

1.

Plants FAQ.

No. Empirical ideas require confirmation in the material world, not necessarily direct observation. An empirical idea is a direct description of reality. We can confirm it by seeing it, measuring it, detecting its effects, reproducing its behavior, or deducing it from reliable material evidence. Direct observation is one path to empirical truth, but it is not the only path.

The Oort Cloud shows the difference. It is a serious speculative idea because long-period comets seem to point toward a distant reservoir of icy bodies surrounding the solar system. The idea is reasonable, even likely, but the cloud itself has not been confirmed. We have not yet observed, measured, sampled, or otherwise verified the proposed reservoir. So, for now, it remains speculative.

Viruses show the other side. Scientists confirmed viruses before they could see them. In 1892, experiments showed that something smaller than bacteria could pass through filters and still cause disease. That was empirical confirmation by effect, not by sight. Later, electron microscopes allowed us to see viruses directly. The idea became empirical before direct observation because the material world was already pushing back in repeatable, measurable ways.

 


I wrote that Plants FAQ, 

and posted it to TST 2 months ago.

2.

Plants Story.

251,902,000 years ago (+/- 900 years).
Cause: Massive Volcanic Eruptions in Siberia

One million years before the end of the Permian world, it was full, stable, and alive. Vast river systems braided across Pangea’s lowlands, feeding dense forests of Glossopteris, towering horsetails, and early conifers. The land belonged to synapsids, our mammalian ancestors. Synapsids ranged from saber-toothed gorgonopsids to tusked dicynodont herds and heavy, armored pareiasaurs. Very large insects filled the air, and ecosystems, though different from today, were mature and deeply interconnected. It was a world that had been building for tens of millions of years. An alien landscape somewhat familiar to us, but not.

Then the Earth broke. Around 251,902,000 years ago, the Siberian Traps erupted in a series of colossal fissure events, pouring out unimaginable volumes of lava and gases. Carbon dioxide and methane drove rapid warming, while sulfur aerosols darkened the skies and acid rain stripped the land. Global warming on a scale never seen before. Oceans stagnated and lost oxygen, poisoning marine life. On land and in the seas, ecosystems collapsed. Roughly 90–96% of all species vanished—the most devastating mass extinction in history, so far. This was not a single moment, but a prolonged unraveling, where survival itself became rare.

In the first million years after, the world was quiet, harsh, and unstable. The great seed-fern forests of the time were gone. Glossopteris-dominated woodlands, along with towering horsetails and early conifers, were reduced to ash and memory, replaced by sparse ferns and low vegetation struggling across eroding floodplains. Rivers shrank and wandered across barren floodplains. Life persisted, but barely. Lystrosaurus and a few other hardy survivors dominated simply because so little else remained. Food webs were short, ecosystems fragile, and the climate still volatile. It was a recovery phase in the most literal sense—a planet relearning how to live.

Over the next tens of millions of years, that empty world became opportunity. New lineages spread into the abandoned niches, experimenting with form and function. Among them were early archosaurs—small, agile reptiles with more upright postures and improved breathing efficiency. These traits would prove decisive. As ecosystems slowly rebuilt through the Triassic, these archosaurs diversified, giving rise to the ancestors of dinosaurs, pterosaurs, and eventually birds. The Great Dying did not just end an age—it cleared the stage for an entirely new one.

 


I wrote that Plants Story, 

and posted it to TST 5 months ago.

3.

Plants FAQ.

Ever look back on a vacation and think it was all perfect sunshine and smooth sailing? That’s Rosy Retrospection at work! It’s a cognitive bias—a common mental pitfall that can impede critical thinking and decision-making.

To make sense of a complicated world, our brains simplify things. We tend to focus on the highlights, like breathtaking views or delicious meals, and forget the minor annoyances—lost luggage, sunburn, or long lines. This is also partly due to how memories are stored: positive emotions are linked to stronger memories, making happy moments more likely to stick.

This phenomenon applies to relationships as well, such as “the one that got away.” Often, we reminisce about these relationships by focusing only on the peak moments, forgetting the reasons why they ended, which can color our memories more positively than reality. Just remember, real life isn’t all sunshine and rainbows.

However, Rosy Retrospection isn’t always bad. Reminiscing for fun and enjoyment can leave you with a positive outlook and enjoyable memories. Just be mindful of this bias when planning to repeat an experience, whether it’s a relationship, job, or idealizing “the good old days.”

Rosy retrospection is a cognitive bias. Mastering it and making it a conscious part of your thinking abilities only requires awareness. Cognitive biases are one of the Four Mind Traps covered in the TST Framework.

 


I wrote that Plants FAQ, 

and posted it to TST 1 year ago.

The end. Refresh for another set.

Scroll to Top