Phil • Cr. Think • Science • Hist • …
TST PRACTICE

By Philosopher Michael Alan Prestwood

STORY

Avialae: Bird Line Diverges

☐ Read
☑ Read
You’ve read this 0 times.
You’ve listened to this 0 times.

By Michael Alan Prestwood

Sat 14 Mar 2026
Published 8 months ago.
Updated 4 months ago.
Related Stories
Tyrannosaurus Rex
The Last Ornithischians
Amniotes Emerge: Amniotic Eggs
Bashanosaurus primitivus
Argentinosaurus
The K-Pg Extinction
Share :
Around 155 million years ago, an early avialan was probably already broadly Archaeopteryx-like, yet still unmistakably dinosaurian: small feathered theropod with teeth, claws, and a long bony tail.

Avialae: Bird Line Diverges

155 Million years ago (+/- 5 million)

From within the therapods, birds emerged about 155 million years ago. These early birds still had teeth, a tail, and claws on their wings, but they were feathered.

Although the exact early avialan boundary is famously messy, we do know birds evolved from theropods. After the “Great Divide” of dinosaur classification into lizard hipped and bird hipped, it was the lizard hipped branch that gave rise to birds. The accidentally miss-labeled bird-hipped dinosaurs includes Stegosaurus, Ankylosaurus, and Triceratops, as well as the duck-billed dinosaurs. The bird-hipped dinosaurs are Ornithischia. The Ornithischia split into the armed dinosaurs called Thyreophorans, the duck-billed dinosaurs called Ornithopods, and the domed and horned ones called Marginocephalians.

Meanwhile, the lizard-hipped dinosaurs of the Saurischia branch, split into the Theropods and Sauropodomorphs. The Sauropodomorphs are the massive, quadrupedal herbivores with long necks and tails, such as the Brachiosaurus and Diplodocus. The Theropods are the terrifying bipedal carnivores such as the Tyrannosaurus rex, Velociraptor, and every bird that has ever existed. Birds emerged from a specific subgroup of small, feathered maniraptoran theropods.

Of interest, birds are not part of the pterosaur line. Pterosaurs were not even dinosaurs, they stemmed from a much earlier flying reptile branch.

A bird from about 155 million years ago would likely have looked broadly Archaeopteryx-like, but not in the polished way popular art often suggests. It would still have been very much a small feathered theropod: long-tailed, toothed, clawed, and only partly birdlike in overall impression. In other words, if it truly belonged on the avialan branch, it was probably already close to that classic transitional look, because Archaeopteryx itself was not yet a fully modern bird but a remarkably dinosaurian one, with feathers layered onto a body plan that still retained many ancestral theropod traits.

About 6 million years after this, the world of Archaeopteryx appears more clearly in the fossil record. By then, the outline of the bird story is easier to see: feathered forelimbs are more visibly functioning as wings, the body is more balanced for aerial maneuvering, and the ancient dinosaur frame is beginning to read, at a glance, like the first true bird experiment. Yet even there, the future is only beginning. The beak is not yet modern, the tail is still long, the claws are still prominent, and the age of birds has barely lifted off.

— map / TST —

TST Tracker
✓ Reading recorded.
Michael Alan Prestwood
Natural Philosopher & Author
Prestwood explores science-first philosophy, with particular attention to the convergence of disciplines. Drawing on his TST Philosophy, his work emphasizes rational inquiry grounded in empirical observation while engaging questions at the edges of established knowledge. With TouchstoneTruth positioned as a living touchstone, this work aims to contribute reliable, evolving analysis in an emerging AI era where the credibility of information is increasingly contested.
Email
Print
The Prestwood Column
Menu
November 2026
Column Research….
1. Timeline Story
Fear-Based Ethics
2. Linked Quote
“A person is a person through other persons; you can’t be human in isolation; you are human only in relationships.”
3. Science FAQ »
Why do complex systems fail when proportionality is removed?
4. Philosophy FAQ »
How does TST Ethics handle the trolley problem?
5. Critical Thinking FAQ »
Why do people confuse rule-following with moral reasoning?
6. History FAQ!
How are original Daoism, Mohism, Confucianism, and Legalism related?
Bonus Deep-Dive Article
TST Moral Calibration: Legal, Moral, and Fair

Comments

Join the Conversation! Currently logged out.

Leave a Reply

NEW BOOK! NOW AVAILABLE!!

30 Philosophers: A New Look at Timeless Ideas

by Michael Alan Prestwood
The story of the history of our best ideas!
Scroll to Top