Weekly Insights for Thinkers

FAQ

Why do people believe wrong things?

Wed 4 Sep 2024
Published 2 years ago.
Updated 1 month ago.
Confirmation Bias
Related FAQs
Is science tainted by bias?
What is confirmation bias, and why does it matter?
Why we only remember the good parts of vacations and forget the bad?
What is the Ebbinghaus Illusion?
Is the prisoner choosing bread over a key to freedom a critical thinking error?
Is the Fermi Paradox still relevant?
Share :

Why do people believe wrong things?

Because our information intake is more about being reassured that we are on the right path, than on seeking truth. And it’s called confirmation bias. It is our natural tendency to favor information that supports what we already believe. And believe it or not, that’s perfectly fine. We seek out and interpret evidence in ways that confirm our existing views. The problem arises when we ignore or dismiss new information. Work hard to never overlook or reject new evidence—this is where we all fall prey to bias, downplaying anything that doesn’t fit our worldview.

While it’s tough to completely eliminate this bias, it’s possible to manage it. The trick? Focus on new information, even when it challenges old, settled ideas.

Let’s start with astrology. Believers in horoscopes often highlight when predictions feel accurate and ignore the misses. Challenging these beliefs requires questioning assumptions and prioritizing hard evidence. A simple blind test—guessing which horoscope is theirs without knowing the sign—can shake even the strongest faith.

Take meditation, for example. While many claim it’s the key to happiness, we might overlook studies that cast doubt on its effectiveness, instead clinging to glowing testimonials. To avoid confirmation bias, actively seek out diverse perspectives, challenge your beliefs, and consider alternative explanations. This is the gateway to true understanding.

Now, consider climate change. Someone who believes it’s a hoax might only read articles supporting that view, dismissing contrary scientific data. To break this pattern, it’s crucial to engage with differing viewpoints and be open to new evidence, even when it challenges deeply held beliefs.

— map / TST —

Michael Alan Prestwood
Author & Natural Philosopher
Prestwood writes on science-first philosophy, with particular attention to the convergence of disciplines. Drawing on his TST Framework, his work emphasizes rational inquiry grounded in empirical observation while engaging questions at the edges of established knowledge. With TouchstoneTruth positioned as a living touchstone, this work aims to contribute reliable, evolving analysis in an emerging AI era where the credibility of information is increasingly contested.
This Week @ TST
March 4, 2026
»Edition Archive
WWB Research….
1. Story of the Week
Marcus Aurelius: An Explorative Agnostic
2. Quote of the Week
“Our knowledge is finite, while our ignorance is infinite.”
3. Science FAQ »
Do we experience reality directly?
4. Philosophy FAQ »
What is TST Ethics?
5. Critical Thinking FAQ »
What is confirmation bias, and why does it matter?
6. History FAQ!
What historical ideas shaped TST Philosophy?
Bonus Deep-Dive Article
1-2-3-4-5: TST Philosophy Overview

Comments

Join the Conversation! Currently logged out.
NEW BOOK! NOW AVAILABLE!!

30 Philosophers: A New Look at Timeless Ideas

by Michael Alan Prestwood
The story of the history of our best ideas!
Scroll to Top