Explore Science-first Philosophy

FAQ

Why do people believe wrong things?

Wed 4 Sep 2024
Published 2 years ago.
Updated 4 weeks ago.
Related FAQs
What is the preservation bias?
Why do scientific models work if they aren’t literally true?
Is science tainted by bias?
If evolution is true, why haven’t humans evolved in 50,000 years?
Does Musk’s Mars vision highlight poor reasoning?
Is agnosticism a ludicrous position to occupy?
Share :
Email
Print

Why do people believe wrong things?

Because much of our information intake is less about seeking truth and more about being reassured that we are on the right path. One reason for that is confirmation bias. Confirmation bias is our natural tendency to favor information that supports what we already believe. In that sense, it is normal. We all do it. The problem begins when we ignore, downplay, or dismiss new information simply because it does not fit what we already think. That is where bias starts leading us away from truth and deeper into our own worldview.

While it is difficult to eliminate confirmation bias completely, it is possible to manage it. The key is to pay close attention to new evidence, especially when it challenges old, settled ideas. That is hard to do, because challenging evidence often feels uncomfortable. But discomfort is often where growth begins.

Take astrology. Believers in horoscopes often notice the predictions that seem accurate and overlook the many misses. That is confirmation bias at work. One way to challenge it is through a blind test, such as asking someone to pick out their horoscope without knowing which sign it belongs to. A simple exercise like that can shake even strong confidence.

Take meditation as another example. Many people speak of it as though it is the key to happiness, and there is real evidence that it can help some people. But confirmation bias can still creep in when we cling only to glowing testimonials and ignore studies that show mixed or limited results. The better approach is to seek out a wider range of evidence and resist turning a helpful practice into a universal answer.

Now consider climate change. Someone convinced it is a hoax may read only articles that reinforce that belief while dismissing the much larger body of scientific evidence pointing the other way. That is how confirmation bias works across serious public issues too. To push back against it, we have to engage with opposing evidence honestly, question our assumptions, and stay open to changing our minds.

— map / TST —

Deep-Dive Article: Identity and Why Maga went Silent on the War
Michael Alan Prestwood
Author & Natural Philosopher
Prestwood writes on science-first philosophy, with particular attention to the convergence of disciplines. Drawing on his TST Framework, his work emphasizes rational inquiry grounded in empirical observation while engaging questions at the edges of established knowledge. With TouchstoneTruth positioned as a living touchstone, this work aims to contribute reliable, evolving analysis in an emerging AI era where the credibility of information is increasingly contested.
TST Column
April 22, 2026
Column Research….
1. Timeline Story
Augustine of Hippo
2. Linked Quote
“In order for a war to be just, three things are necessary.”
3. Science FAQ »
Why do we overreact and escalate?
4. Philosophy FAQ »
How does TST Ethics handle the trolley problem?
5. Critical Thinking FAQ »
How do you prevent yourself from overreacting?
6. History FAQ!
What is the history of ethical war?
Bonus Deep-Dive Article
1 Goal: Flourish (TST Ethics)

Comments

Join the Conversation! Currently logged out.
NEW BOOK! NOW AVAILABLE!!

30 Philosophers: A New Look at Timeless Ideas

by Michael Alan Prestwood
The story of the history of our best ideas!
Scroll to Top